This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article was copy edited by Corinne, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 28 November 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
CE
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Did quick ce while review pending, rv as desired, regards Keith-264 (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
As a quick comment, there seems to be some over referencing as quite a few basic facts receive multiple references for no clear reason (eg, "An SS military base near Blizna was set up on 5 November 1943, from which 139 A4 (also known as V-2) rockets were launched for experimental purposes and for training.[3][11][5][6]", "worked at the Blizna test site and personally visited the test missile impact areas to troubleshoot any problems discovered during trials.[3][11][20][6][7][8][16]", etc). This makes the article look a bit dubious. Also, what makes "RussianSpaceWeb.Com" and "Polish Greatness.com" reliable sources that need to be used here? Some of the other references also seem to be enthusiast websites and the like. Nick-D (talk) 22:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Nick-D I added all the available references when putting the article together in the knowledge that we would loose a few. They all tell slightly different stories, so will be useful in the expansion of the article. Many refs are in Polish. As it is a new article I don't think the large amount of refs is doing it any harm.
Best regards -- Marek.69talk 16:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on V-2 missile launch site, Blizna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
.jpg){kind=small}
