United States Reports, volume 3

This is a list of cases reported in volume 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States from 1794 to 1799.[1] Case reports from other tribunals also appear in 3 U.S. (3 Dall.).

Supreme Court of the United States
Map
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 235 years ago (1789-03-04)
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized byConstitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov
Alexander Dallas as Secretary of the Treasury (1814–1816)

Alexander Dallas and Dallas Reports

Not all of the cases reported in 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) are from the United States Supreme Court. Included are decisions from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and the United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania. Alexander J. Dallas, a Philadelphia lawyer and later United States Secretary of the Treasury, had been in the business of reporting local law cases for newspapers and periodicals. When the US Supreme Court sat in Philadelphia from 1791–1800, he collected their cases as well, and later began compiling his case reports in a bound volume which he called Reports of cases ruled and adjudged in the courts of Pennsylvania, before and since the Revolution.[2]

When the US Supreme Court along with the rest of the new federal government moved in 1791 from the former capital, New York City, to the nation's temporary capital in Philadelphia, Dallas was appointed the Supreme Court's first unofficial and unpaid Supreme Court Reporter. (Court reporters in that age received no salary, but were expected to profit from the publication and sale of their compiled decisions.) Dallas continued to collect and publish Pennsylvania and other decisions, adding federal Supreme Court cases to his reports. Dallas published four volumes of decisions during his tenure as Reporter, known as the Dallas Reports.

The Supreme Court moved to the new capital city of Washington D.C. in 1800. Dallas remained in Philadelphia; William Cranch then replaced him as Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Nominative Reports

In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called "nominative reports"). As such, volumes 1–4 of United States Reports correspond to volumes 1–4 of Dallas Reports. The dual citation form of, for example, Hunter v. Fairfax's Devisee is 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 305 (1796).

Courts in 3 U.S. (3 Dall.)

The cases reported in 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) come from the Supreme Court of the United States, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (Pa.), and the United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania (C.C.D. Pa.).

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 3 U.S. (3 Dall.)

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[3] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) were decided, the Court comprised six of the following eleven justices at one time:

PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
John JayChief JusticeNew Yorkoriginal seat when the Court was establishedSeptember 26, 1789
(Acclamation)
October 19, 1789

June 29, 1795
(Resigned)
John RutledgeChief JusticeSouth Carolinaoriginal seat when the Court was establishedSeptember 26, 1789
(Acclamation)
February 15, 1790

March 4, 1791
(Resigned)
William CushingAssociate JusticeMassachusettsoriginal seat when the Court was establishedSeptember 26, 1789
(Acclamation)
February 2, 1790

September 13, 1810
(Died)
James WilsonAssociate JusticePennsylvaniaoriginal seat when the Court was establishedSeptember 26, 1789
(Acclamation)
October 5, 1789

August 21, 1798
(Died)
John BlairAssociate JusticeVirginiaoriginal seat when the Court was establishedSeptember 26, 1789
(Acclamation)
February 2, 1790

October 25, 1795
(Resigned)
James IredellAssociate JusticeNorth Carolinaoriginal seat when the Court was establishedFebruary 10, 1790
(Acclamation)
May 12, 1790

October 20, 1799
(Died)
Thomas JohnsonAssociate JusticeMarylandJohn Rutledge (after Rutledge's first term on the Court)November 7, 1791
(Acclamation)
August 6, 1792

January 16, 1793
(Resigned)
William PatersonAssociate JusticeNew JerseyThomas JohnsonMarch 4, 1793
(Acclamation)
March 11, 1793

September 8, 1806
(Died)
Samuel ChaseAssociate JusticeMarylandJohn Blair, Jr.January 27, 1796
(Acclamation)
February 4, 1796

June 19, 1811
(Died)
Oliver EllsworthChief JusticeConnecticutJohn Rutledge (after Rutledge's second term on the Court)March 4, 1796
(21–1)
March 8, 1796

December 15, 1800
(Resigned)
Bushrod WashingtonAssociate JusticeVirginiaJames WilsonDecember 20, 1798
(Acclamation)
November 9, 1798
(Recess Appointment)

November 26, 1829
(Died)

Notable Cases in 3 U.S. (3 Dall.)

Calder v. Bull

In Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 386 (1798), the Supreme Court decided four important points of constitutional law:

  • First, the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution applies to criminal laws that have at least one of four effects: (a) creates a crime and penalty that before passage of the law which was not illegal; (b) makes an existing crime of greater severity than it was when committed; (c) inflicts a greater punishment to an existing crime than applied before the law; (d) changes rules of evidence to make less, or different, evidence than the law required at the time of the crime to convict the offender.
  • Second, the Court lacked authority to nullify state laws that may violate that state's own constitution.
  • Third, no one should be compelled to do what the laws do not require; nor to refrain from acts which the laws permit.
  • Fourth, a state legislative act does not violate of the ex post facto clause if there is nothing done by the parties that is affected by the state law.

Georgia v. Brailsford

In Georgia v. Brailsford, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 1 (1794), is significant as the only reported jury trial held by the US Supreme Court. During the American Revolution, the state of Georgia passed a law that sequestered debts owed to British creditors. The Treaty of Paris, however, asserted the validity of debts held by creditors on both sides. The case was filed directly in the United States Supreme Court, rather than in a lower trial court, under the Supreme Court's constitutionally-defined original jurisdiction.

Hollingsworth v. Virginia

In Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 378 (1798) the Court held the President of the United States has no formal role in the process of amending the United States Constitution, and that the Eleventh Amendment was binding on cases already pending before its ratification.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in 3 U.S. (3 Dall.)

Cases of the Supreme Court of the United States

CasePage & yearOpinions of the CourtLower courtDisposition
Georgia v. Brailsford1 (1794)Jay (charge to the jury)originaljury verdict for defendants[4]
Glass v. The Sloop Betsey6 (1794)JayD. Md.Reversed
United States v. Hamilton17 (1795)WilsonD. Pa.certification
Bingham v. Cabot19 (1795)seriatim: Paterson, Iredell, Wilson, CushingC.C.D. Mass.reversed
United States v. Lawrence42 (1795)per curiamD.N.Y.mandamus denied
Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators54 (1795)CushingC.C.D.N.H.reversed
United States v. Peters121 (1795)RutledgeD. Pa.prohibition issued
Talbot v. Janson133 (1795)seriatim: Paterson, IredellC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Hylton v. United States171 (1796)seriatim: Chase, Paterson, IredellC.C.D. Va.affirmed
Hills v. Ross184 (1796)per curiamC.C.D. Ga.continued
McDonough v. Dannery188 (1796)per curiamC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
Ware v. Hylton199 (1796)seriatim: Chase, Wilson, CushingC.C.D. Va.reversed
Geyer v. Michel285 (1796)per curiamC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
United States v. La Vengeance297 (1796)EllsworthC.C.D.N.Y.affirmed
Cotton v. Wallace302 (1796)per curiamC.C.D. Ga.mandate granted
Hunter v. Fairfax's Devisee305 (1796)per curiamnot indicatedcontinued
Arcambel v. Wiseman306 (1796)per curiamC.C.D.R.I.remittitur granted
Moodie v. The Ship Alfred307 (1796)per curiamnot indicatedaffirmed
Olney v. Arnold308 (1796)EllsworthR.I. Super. Ct.affirmed
Moodie v. The Ship Phoebe Anne319 (1796)EllsworthC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Grayson v. Virginia320 (1796)Ellsworthoriginalsubpoena granted
Wiscart v. Dauchy321 (1796)per curiamC.C.D. Va.affirmed
Hills v. Ross331 (1796)seriatim: Ellsworth, Iredell, ChaseC.C.D. Ga.reversed
Del Col v. Arnold333 (1796)per curiamC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Jennings v. The Brig Perseverance336 (1797)seriatim: Paterson, ChaseC.C.D.R.I.affirmed
Huger v. South Carolina339 (1797)seriatim: Iredell, Chaseoriginalpetition granted
Clerke v. Harwood342 (1797)per curiamMd.affirmed
Brown v. Van Braam344 (1797)seriatim: Wilson, Paterson, ChaseC.C.D.R.I.affirmed
Fenemore v. United States357 (1797)seriatim: Chase, Iredell, Cushing, Ellsworth, PatersonC.C.D.N.J.affirmed
Brown v. Barry365 (1797)EllsworthC.C.D. Va.affirmed
Emory v. Grenough369 (1797)per curiamC.C.D. Mass.dismissed
Hamilton v. Moore371 (1797)per curiamC.C.D. Ga.dismissed
Hollingsworth v. Virginia378 (1798)per curiam, and Chasenot indicateddismissed
Bingham v. Cabot382 (1798)per curiamC.C.D. Mass.dismissed
Jones v. Le Tombe384 (1798)per curiamoriginalrule made absolute
Calder v. Bull386 (1798)seriatim: Chase, Paterson, Iredell, CushingConn.affirmed
Wilson v. Daniel401 (1798)seriatim: Ellsworth, Iredell, ChaseC.C.D. Va.affirmed
Dewhurst v. Coulthard409 (1799)per curiamC.C.D.N.Y.dismissed
Ex parte Hallowell410 (1799)per curiamoriginalHallowell admitted to bar of Court
Fowler v. Lindsey411 (1799)seriatim: Washington, Paterson, CushingC.C.D. Conn.rule discharged
Clarke v. Russel415 (1799)EllsworthC.C.D.R.I.reversed
Sims' Lessee v. Irvine425 (1799)seriatim: Ellsworth, IredellC.C.D. Pa.affirmed

Cases of other tribunals

CasePage and yearCourt
Respublica[5] v. Cobbett467 (Pa. 1798)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Anonymous477 (Pa. 1798)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Camberling v. McCall477 (Pa. 1798)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Coxe v. McClenachan478 (Pa. 1798)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Pemberton's Lessee v. Hicks479 (Pa. 1798)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
McKee's Lessee v. Pfout486 (Pa. 1798)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Respublica[5] v. Wray490 (Pa. 1799)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Murgatroyd v. Crawford491 (Pa. 1799)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Breckbill v. Turnpike Company496 (Pa. 1799)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Dallas v. Chaloner's Executors500 (Pa. 1799)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Wharton's Executors v. Fitzgerald503 (Pa. 1799)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Reed v. Ingraham505 (Pa. 1799)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Peterson v. Willing506 (Pa. 1799)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Roberts v. Wheelen506 (Pa. 1799)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Pollock v. Donaldson510 (C.C.D. Pa. 1799)United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania
Hurst v. Hurst512 (C.C.D. Pa. 1799)United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania
United States v. Insurgents of Pennsylvania513 (C.C.D. Pa. 1799)United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania
United States v. Fries515 (C.C.D. Pa. 1799)United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

Notes and References

See also