Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roshan Meka: Difference between revisions

*:NACTOR is an {{tq|Additional criteria}} which shows {{tq|People are likely to be notable if they meet}} it. [[WP:BIO]] specifically says about these criteria that {{tq|meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included.}} A movie review which devotes two lines to the subject isn't the sort of coverage that meets [[WP:GNG]] (some of the sourced reviews don't even have a single specific line about him; they combine both stars like "The duo makes the most" and leave at that). Award isn't notable, like say Padma awards, to merit inclusion without sources. [[User:Hemantha|Hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|talk]]) 14:38, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

*::Meeting [[WP:SNG|SNG]] (much like meeting GNG) means that the subject has merit for inclusion. However, consensus can determine whether the article can be merged elsewhere (such as [[WP:BLP1E]]) or deleted for reasons other than notability ([[WP:NOT]]). Its not a advocacy for GNG over SNG because an article may still be deleted in the above conditions even after that subject has met GNG. I mentioned the reviews part to support "significant roles in multiple notable films," for the NACTOR requirement, not GNG. Goes without saying that any review rarely spares more than two lines for a single actor because they ought to cover the film in a comprehensive manner. -- [[User:Ab207|Ab207]] ([[User talk:Ab207|talk]]) 15:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)