Talk:Nonmetal/GA2: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 16:16, 9 February 2022 edit CactiStaccingCrane (talk \| contribs) 24,860 edits ←Created page with '==GA Reassessment== {{subst:GAR/subst\|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} <!-- Please add all reassessment comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the discussion within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the reassessment. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> Notifying {{ping\|Sandbh}}. Look, I know that you have worked on an article so hard, yet the article gets reassessed and it seems lik...'		Revision as of 18:51, 9 February 2022 edit undo Graham Beards (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 34,552 edits →‎GA Reassessment: comment Next edit →
Line 18: I want to mention accessibility and layout problems as well, but that's for another time. There's a ton of work to do already :) [[User:CactiStaccingCrane\|CactiStaccingCrane]] ([[User talk:CactiStaccingCrane\|talk]]) 16:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC) '''Speedy keep and close this GAR''' I see no reasons for a GAR on this article at all. I don't think [[User:CactiStaccingCrane\|CactiStaccingCrane]] is capable of appraising the prose given the gibberish they have written on this page. What on Earth does "How does nonmetals are discovered since the ancient times?" mean? The question is totally incomprehensible. The review of [[SpaceX Starship]] has absolutely nothing to do with this article or its GA status. This nomination just comes across as some sort of convoluted tit for tat and is disruptive editing. [[User:Graham Beards\|Graham Beards]] ([[User talk:Graham Beards\|talk]]) 18:51, 9 February 2022 (UTC)