Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sujit Meher: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎Sujit Meher: more canvassing
Closing debate, result was delete
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
 
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
 
The result was '''delete'''. Consensus in this community discussion is that this is an exercise in self-promotion, which we empathically do not want, by a non-notable person. Accounts who continue with such editing may find themselves summarily blocked. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 21:38, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
===[[Sujit Meher]]===
 
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 
:{{la|Sujit Meher}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sujit Meher|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 March 23#{{anchorencode:Sujit Meher}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sujit_Meher Stats]</span>)
Line 35 ⟶ 42:
*'''Delete''' Finally got my brain into gear and have had a look at the sources and for other sources. My original gut feeling - advertorial/promotion/no real notability stands. Please note that ''The Times of India'' is nowadays in many respects little more than a vehicle for puff pieces and has lost much of the kudos that once it had: standards have dropped enormously, even on such basic things as quality of prose, let alone of subject matter. Truly notable designers get mentions outside their own country: fashion is an international "movement", not a parochial one. DGG has it right, as far as I can see. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 09:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' - I wasn't going to get involved, but then I was one of the lucky several to get solicited by [[User:Novelbuzz|Novelbuzz]] and so I thought I may as well take a look. Sorry, but I have to agree with everyone else who is saying delete. When this person becomes properly notable, then he can have an article, but right now, at my most super-charitable best, it is too borderline to call either way, and because I'm not feeling super-charitable about being canvassed, I'm going delete. [[User:Mabalu|Mabalu]] ([[User talk:Mabalu|talk]]) 09:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>