People v. Turner: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 02:28, 18 June 2016 edit Carwil (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 8,198 edits →‎top: the intoxication charge does not require "intoxication to the point of unconsciousness." Tag: Visual edit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:31, 18 June 2016 edit undo Ranze (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,222 edits →‎Defendant's statements: this was relevant enough for Emily to mention so it makes sense to include it as a notable attributed statement. Next edit →
Line 107: According to Turner's statement, he and the woman drank, danced, and kissed at the party. Sometime around midnight, he asked her whether she would like to go back to his dorm and she said yes. He claimed that she had slipped behind a wooden shed and then he got down on the ground with her and started kissing and fingering her until he got nauseous and decided to walk to another location to throw up.<ref name = Miller/><ref>{{cite web \|url=https://www.scribd.com/doc/315196808/Brock-Turner-Statement \|title=Brock Turner Statement \|work=CBSNewsPolitics \|accessdate=June 10, 2016}}</ref> The impact statement from Emily Doe also claims Brock said in court that she orgasmed after 1 minute of fingering.<ref name=":3"/> Turner stated, "It debilitates me to think that my actions have caused her [Emily Doe] emotional and physical stress that is completely unwarranted and unfair."<ref>{{Cite news\|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/07/brock-turner-statement-stanford-rape-case-campus-culture\|title=Brock Turner's statement blames sexual assault on Stanford ‘party culture’\|date=2016-06-07\|work=The Guardian\|last2=Wong\|first2=Julia Carrie\|issn=0261-3077\|last1=Levin\|first1=Sam\|accessdate=2016-06-17}}</ref>