Talk:People v. Turner: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 05:38, 24 June 2016 edit Ranze (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,222 edits →‎Conviction reliability ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:46, 24 June 2016 edit undo Ranze (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,222 edits →‎alcohol percentages Next edit →
Line 588: :::Yes, it is an odd reference for this context. But notice, when the doctor is quoted, the number for Doe is not the same as when Alice King is quoted. Maybe the papers are using this comparison to avoid the contradictions in numbers. [[user:sfarney\|<span style="text-shadow: 1px 1px 1px #88ff88, -1px -1px 1px #8888ff;text-weight:light">Grammar's Li'l Helper</span>]] [[user_talk:sfarney\|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 07:00, 22 June 2016 (UTC) ::::I would report the court testimony (Alice King) as the most reliable especially if it was not challenged by the other side during the trial. It is the least likely to suffer from clerical/reporting error and most likely to be checked by the best experts. BTW I note that a court order might have been needed to take a blood test of Turner and they may have wanted consent before taking a sample for the most reliable testing from Doe hence the delay. [[User:Erp\|Erp]] ([[User talk:Erp\|talk]]) 13:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC) Given that most documents in this case are sealed and only accessible by select trusted media groups how feasible would it be for the entire attached blood report by Alice King to be public domain for us to reference? I would lime to know things like when good was drawn, who took it, when it was tested, who tested it, when King made each estimate, her mathematical explanations of the estimates, and also when each of them had their drinks since that would also reflect when it was metabolized. Things like this would enhance the article. I do recall some testimony about number/type of beverage and will add that in but the more the better. Most notably, Turner is described vomiting, but I can't recall if Emily was. Was there evidence of any drinking in the alley? Alcohol drunk immediately before the Swedes' arrival would not have been metabolized so as to intoxicate yet could have metabolized afterward to affect later readings. Was the dumpster searched for discarded bottles and either's DNA? [[User:Ranze\|Ranze]] ([[User talk:Ranze\|talk]]) 05:46, 24 June 2016 (UTC) == Reactions section or article ==