Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muzammil Haque: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 14:11, 26 January 2020 edit Ymblanter (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 256,588 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Muzammil Haque. (TW)		Revision as of 17:14, 26 January 2020 edit undo Usernamekiran (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 33,356 edits →‎Muzammil Haque: del Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Next edit →
Line 7: Whereas the subject is possibly notable, the article is POV and says nothing about the subject. [[User:Ymblanter\|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter\|talk]]) 14:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC) :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India\|list of India-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Ymblanter\|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter\|talk]]) 14:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)</small> *'''delete''' I could find only one [[wp:rs\|reliable source]] that mentions the subject which is not already in the article. Even [http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/detailsnew.asp?id=oct2119/state055 that source] mentions him in passing. But this source looks more like a press release by an organisation in his name. All I could find was ''non-reliable sources'' mentioning things named after the subject like school, hostel, and similar; but not about the subject himself. I also added a little content about the subject from a source already present in the article, which is about the death of subjec's brother. Such paid "people mourning after XYZ's death" obituaries/news are common in India. Overall, the subject doesn't have coverage, nor [[wp:sigcov\|significant coverage]] in sources, only passing mentions that too mostly in non-reliable sources; thus failing [[wp:gng\|general notability criteria]]. —usernamekiran [[User talk:usernamekiran\|(talk)]] 17:14, 26 January 2020 (UTC)