Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 13:42, 27 January 2020 edit Renamed user U1krw4txwPvuEp3lqV382vOcqa7 (talk \| contribs) 68,802 edits →‎Jaggi Vasudev: c ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:45, 27 January 2020 edit undo Jp7311 (talk \| contribs) 88 edits →‎Jaggi Vasudev Next edit →
Line 635: :::{{u\|My Lord}}, umm, no. RSN is that way, where you need to prove how outlets having won multiple Ramnath Goenkas or subject to critical acclaim over NewYorker fails RS. The sources dictate the levels of coverage and not our personal feelings. [[User:Winged Blades of Godric\|<span style="color: red">∯</span><span style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:#070">WBG</b></span>]][[User talk:Winged Blades of Godric\|<sup><span style="color:#00F">converse</span></sup>]] 11:50, 27 January 2020 (UTC) ::::The [[Ramnath_Goenka_Excellence_in_Journalism_Awards\|Ramnath Goenka award]] is given to individual journalists, not to publications. Being a recipient of the award is also no guarantee of that particular journalist being completely unbiased and factual in the future. With that being said, none of the sources whose opinions you've quoted (or the ones that you're defending) in this article are recipients of the award. [[Special:Contributions/2409:4072:6394:A403:7D27:BB7E:7D23:DDCE\|2409:4072:6394:A403:7D27:BB7E:7D23:DDCE]] ([[User talk:2409:4072:6394:A403:7D27:BB7E:7D23:DDCE\|talk]]) 13:38, 27 January 2020 (UTC) :::{{ping\|Harshil169}} Pseudoscience? You made *41 edits* to the page in December (it received only 100 edits in total) and deleted chunks of factual content on [https:https://www.search.com.vn/wiki/index.php?lang=en&q=Jaggi_Vasudev&type=revision&diff=925157306&oldid=925150952 the UNITED NATIONS Millenium Peace Summit, WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM], Global Landscapes Forum, etc. from top tier media sources: Forbes, The Hindu, The Economic Times and The Indian Express. And the reason you provided was - "WP:NOTNEWS. These things are blatant WP:RECENTISM. Doesn't matter in encyclopedia." :::Even now, after its been brought to the BLP Noticeboard and you've been informed by {{ping\|My_Lord}} that Pseudoscience doesn't pertain to BLP, you continue to [https:https://www.search.com.vn/wiki/index.php?lang=en&q=Jaggi_Vasudev&type=history&diff=937776561&oldid=937776326 war on the page]. And I see that you're doing similar stuff on the connected Isha Foundation page. :::You put [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=919727242 a very serious allegation] and cited an article from Firstpost. And shortly thereafter, blocked someone trying to provide a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=924355224 counter POV] even though they used the exact same source as you had - Firstpost. And you didn't even offer a reason for the block. Its plain to see what's going on here. So rather than preach to {{ping\|Tamilmama}} on Pseudoscience, I'd ask you to educate yourself on BLP policies and how not to violate them. [[User:Jp7311\|Jp7311]] ([[User talk:Jp7311\|talk]]) 13:45, 27 January 2020 (UTC) The sources connecting Sadhguru to BJP and "Hindutva", fail to stand the test of even the simplest scrutiny. Besides him stating on several occasions that he has no political leanings<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=On3Pfh94Bqw</ref>, he has endorsed several parties and leaders directly in opposition of BJP many times.