Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Bot clerking: archiving (1 approved) (0 open requests remaining)
Line 15:
*Thank you for your contributions! The problem I have with these situations though is that schools are automatically notable. As long as you can prove they exist that's basically the only standard. There's nothing wrong with that, but it doesn't really show us your competency as an article creator in different fields, like BLPs for example. Do you have any examples of content creation not related to schools? [[User:Swarm|<span style="color:black">'''~Swarm~'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:DarkViolet">{sting}</span>]]</sup> 20:28, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
: {{Ping|Swarm}}, thankyou for your interest. I am creating only education-related articles because I feel that these articles should be on Wikipedia. I will surely create other types of articles but only when I will come across one of them. You can check my participation in AfDs so that you can clear your views that I am aware of Wikipedia guidelines or not. [[User:GargAvinash|GargAvinash]] ([[User talk:GargAvinash|talk]]) 13:50, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
====[[User:Ichthyovenator]]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Ichthyovenator}}
This user has created 67 main space articles with no deletions. Their creations are very high quality and well referenced; see [[Pretenders to the Byzantine throne]] for one I just patrolled. They have contributed to 2 FAs and lots of GAs. It looks like they usually start articles in userspace and only move them to mainspace when ready for review, so no issues there. <span style="background:Black;padding:1px 5px">[[User:Buidhe|<b style="color: White">b</b>]][[User talk:Buidhe|<b style="color: White">uidh</b>]][[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|<b style="color: White">e</b>]]</span> 18:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)