Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by at . The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:


May 2017

Replace "Articlename" above with the title of the article you are requesting. Replace these instructions with your comments. Leave the tildes in place so that your signature is appended to the request. Gmhardesty (talk) 04:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Vansk007 (talk) 06:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking to get this article up to GA quality before nominating it, so can someone help me with writing the summary at the top before the start of the plot? I'm having trouble summarising it all myself, as the article has been very well detailed by myself. Thank you - Metal121 (talk) 23:14, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working A lot of good editing can happen in ten years. (talk) 02:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Requesting a copy-edit of this article before submitting for good article status. Thanks in advance. Punyaboy (talk) 14:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Keira1996 23:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Need for a thorough copy-edit before submitting for GA or FA nomination. Parmar-ajn (talk) 05:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold. This article has had 50+ significant edits over the last ten days. It is not stable enough for copy-editing. Check the article's history periodically to see if it has settled down. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For how long? – BroVic (talk) 12:51, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Until it settles down. If it doesn't settle down in the next week or two, we can have a discussion on the Requests talk page about declining this request until the article is stable. See above: Requests may be declined if the article is "unstable, undergoing rapid development, the venue for an ongoing edit war, or otherwise not yet suitable for copy editing." – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Planning to take to GA. Yeepsi (talk) 13:22, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working. ɯɐɔ 💬 05:10, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article became GA years ago and it got a lot of new content. Take your time considering its size. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Quae legit (talk) 19:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please give this one a brilliant copy edit—improve the prose's flow, word choice, logical quotation style—before I nominate it for GA and later for FA. If possible, please also tweak the grammar of the alts for images. Thanks. Bluesphere 03:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working --Paradoxasauruser (talk) 13:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A thorough copy-editing would be perfect for my future GA/FA nominations.Krish | Talk 15:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on making this page a Good Article. Sagecandor said that the writing could use some improvement and I agree as well. Xtremeroller (talk) 01:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working NinjaDuckie (talk) 15:05, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wanto bring the article above to FA status in the future, so I would appreciate a copy editing. Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:57, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

It has become a GA recently, and it would be really helpful if it would undergo a ce process, before taking it to an FA. Thanks in advance!Adityavagarwal (talk) 02:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)  Working  – Corinne (talk) 03:03, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would greatly appreciate a c/e of this article as I would like to bring it to FAC in the future. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 15:46, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great info but might not have the best organization. Would like to see it reach GA eventually. Thanks. Cake (talk) 16:22, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please give this article a brilliant copy edit before I submit it for FAC. On the Filming and cinematography subsection, please reword this clause "As Downtown Los Angeles had changed for the better," as if to imply that the neighborhood has improved in its physical appearance. Thanks. Bluesphere 13:44, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It has become a GA recently, and it would be really helpful if it would undergo a ce process, before taking it to an FA. Thanks in advance! Adityavagarwal (talk) 21:53, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

B class article with a lot of content. Could use a copyedit. Harizotoh9 (talk) 04:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Seraphim System (talk) 01:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a great amount of research and expanded the article. A copyedit would be helpful, thank you ! Sagecandor (talk) 06:44, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fascinating article.  Working... GABgab 22:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Sagecandor: I've gone through a few times, and I think I'm more or less  Done. Thanks, GABgab 02:01, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to promote this article to FA, and while I believe it is close to standards, I think it still has a few issues that need to be addressed. Consequently, a copy-edit would really make it shine. (Of note, the article was criticized at a previous FAN for being written in an inappropriate—i.e., overly-academic—register, and if a willing copy-editor could 'take it down a notch', I'd be grateful.)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tight copy-editing would be perfect for my future FL nomination.Krish | Talk 11:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about a young nobleman who could have been the king of Jerusalem if he had been willing to fight for it against his stepfather. Before its GAN, the article obviously needs a thorough copyedit. Borsoka (talk) 08:48, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate a thorough copy-edit of this article before submitting it for GAN. Thanks. – Brojam (talk) 17:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I recently created this article on an R&B song and put it up for GAN. I would greatly appreciate it a c/e. Thank you in advance. Aoba47 (talk) 02:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the grammar before I nominate it for GA. RRD দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 17:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]