Talk:List of open-source software for mathematics

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

A lot of work for little purpose

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A few people are putting a lot of work in to this page which almost surely will be either deleted or cut down considerably.

All the material describing open source and its purported advantages does not belong here, and undoubtedly has been properly covered elsewhere.
The page Mathematical software contains links to Wikipedia lists of computer algebra systems, statistical packages, etc.
There is a Category: Free mathematics software that encompasses most of the packages on this page.

So the value-added in this page would be:

Simply to enumerate which packages are open source
Perhaps add new information on each package

My suggestion is to put all that effort into updating the individual pages for the packages themselves. Then, perhaps, convert this page into a list of links.

M.boli (talk) 15:36, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Freemat

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Freemat is missing. Shcha (talk) 10:16, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Added FreeMat. GNU Octave was already there as Octave. M.boli (talk) 02:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

GNU Octave

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

GNU Octave is missing. Shcha (talk) 10:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

No Table of Contents

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

If this is going to be a long list that has categories, descriptions, etc. it should really have a Contents. Wikispherion (talk) 21:35, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

The TOC renders on the right-hand side, it seems. Maybe you can play with __TOC__ to see if that repositions the TOC? -- M.boli (talk) 00:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Add topic