Template talk:Infobox United States District Court case
 | Law Redirect‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
"Holding" field not working?
Fixed
The "holding" parameter does not appear to work. For example, Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc., Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, & McLean v. Arkansas (just to pick the first three transclusions in the list at Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Infobox United States District Court case) all include holdings; but the holding does not appear in the infobox. Specifying the "holding" parameter does cause the heading Holding to appear; but not the text of the holding itself. TJRC (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Can someone add a "plaintiff" field?
Can someone add a "plaintiff" field? I would do it myself, but I do not want to accidentally break a complex template. Right now we have "prosecution" and "defendant" - and "prosecution" is clearly incorrect in a civil case. Thanks --Neutralitytalk 03:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Why no "counsel for defendant" field?
or counsel for defendants(s) Thanks Rhadow (talk) 12:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
I was unable to get the image to load for DDC when leaving image and imagesize blank
| USA vs whoever | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | United States District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Full case name | USA vs whoever |
| Defendant(s) | whoever |
| Plaintiff(s) | United States of America |
| Citation(s) | 1 U.S.C. § 2. |
| Court membership | |
| Judge(s) sitting | Judge Judge |
Geo8rge (talk) 21:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- The problem seems to be the infobox template was not updated to include the image variable discussed in Template:Infobox_United_States_District_Court_case#Technical_information. In my sandbox that code solved the problem. I don't know if I should make the change without authorization. Should I? Geo8rge (talk) 00:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)