Wikipedia:Editor review/Nimbusania (2)

Nimbusania (talk · contribs · count) Hi, this is my second review. I am looking to get some suggestions and recommendations of things I can do to improve. Any positive or negative feedback would be very helpful to me. Thanks, Nimbusania talk 03:41, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

• I was looking at your contribs, and you user-page, and you seem to be an amazingly well rounded editor. As you have said, you have not had any disputes, but what you said about not communicating might be an issue later on. Although I'm sure you would communicate when necessary, I also find it good to talk to other users whenever. I hand out awards, talk about both articles and userpages, and occasionally just talk. I have not been as active as usual due to RL, but I still would start communicating more with editors (to where you find yourself a pretty well know person in your view). Not essential, but I find it fun, stress-relieving, and additive to the collaborative nature of Wikipedia, sometimes keeps sanity when you need to just take a break. Either way you're still a well-rounded editor. Marx01 ^{Tell me about it} 03:43, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?

   The types of things that make up most of my edit count include: anti-vandalism activities, spell checks, fixing badly translated articles, some photos and a couple of maps and just general clean-up. I don't have any particular edits of which I am particularly proud, as I am still in the stage of finding a particular area of Wikipedia to focus on.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   I don't communicate much with other users, so I'm certain that I have never had any disputes with other editors, both anonymous and user.