Template talk:Missing information
Page contents not supported in other languages.
IMHO this template should categorize an article under "NPOV disputes," not "accuracy disputes." I would think that if there is an actual dispute as to whether information should be included or excluded, most likely the dispute relates to a concern regarding POV. If uncontroversial information were missing from an article, one would use a cleanup-type template or an expansion-request template instead of this template.69.140.157.138 09:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A longstanding issue with wp:EL's avoid list is the instruction to avoid links to sites containing nothing beyond "what the article would contain if it became a featured article". The intent there is that such links should be converted to references and used to develop the article text, rather than buried in the EL section. It would seem that including such a link as an explicit parameter to this template would further that end. Views? LeadSongDog come howl! 17:53, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I used the example syntax, but it produced duplicate date= text, which was then fixed by AnomieBOT. How should the example be revised?
(Also, there seems to be no way for the template to link to a specific talkpage section, but I'll leave that for later.) --SoledadKabocha (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There are 8 more co-authors for Trump's books not listed, according to
<ref>< WorldCat (First Search): OCLC Catalog of Books and Other Materials in Libraries World Wide (You can also get this database through your library.
The Art of the Deal was co-written by Tony Schwartz; Surviving at the Top was co-written by Charles Leerhsen, as was The Art of Survival. How to Get Rich was co-written by Meredith McIver (as were 4 more of his books).:Trump: Think Like a Billionaire; Trump: 101 the Key to Success; Trump: Never Give Up; and Think Like a Champion.
(Sorry if I posted this wrong; I've never tried it before)
This template is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 May 20#Template:Missing information. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't this template pretty much redundant to {{incomplete}}? —howcheng {chat} 05:47, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is this the right place to mention that the article is incomplete? My platoon was wiped out on 8/18/1968 in IV Corps. It was 3rd platoon, Co E, 4/47th Regiment, 2nd Brigade (Mobile Riverine Force), 9th Infantry Division. I have published references. How do I get this information included? {[[2601:480:4002:D476:B0F1:D3A3:336D:633F (talk) 20:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I added the historical information and and missing information not previously existing in the article. Can the missing information and historical information tags be removed please. Oneclickwi (talk) 16:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
{{Missing information}}
. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. I assume you're talking about Air Cargo Carriers. If so, you should be able to directly edit the page to make the changes you want. —RP88 (talk) 20:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]Please add {{subst:tfm|Incomplete}}
, per a nomination by Lojbanist {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Can we give named parameters for 1 and 2? i.e. article_type and info_missing? Daviddwd (talk) 09:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
VisualEditor shows the "Info missing" and "date" fields, and fills it out like this: {{Missing information|2=hello|date=date=July 2020}}, which looks like this:
Any ideas on how to change the template to fix this? —Enervation (talk) 21:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Add after the line starting with |date
:
|small={{{small|}}}
So a small version is available for sections.Artoria2e5 🌉 02:05, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please see The Book of Tasty and Healthy Food. It appears from the accompanying article about the template that this template should substitute "article" into the output when "section" is not specified. It's not doing this. --LilHelpa (talk) 16:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The bold text seems unhelpful and is visually unappealing. Suggest replacing:
| issue = This {{#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{1}}}|article}} '''is missing information about {{{2|{{{about|{{{on|{{{reason|{{{1<includeonly>|{{error|Error: you must specify what information is missing.}}</includeonly>}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}'''.
With:
| issue = This {{#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{1}}}|article}} is missing information about {{{2|{{{about|{{{on|{{{reason|{{{1<includeonly>|{{error|Error: you must specify what information is missing.}}</includeonly>}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}.
Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{edit template-protected}}
template. Bold typeface for emphasis is rarely appealing to the eye. It's usefulness is tied to that, which just means that it's unappealing nature draws the attention and focuses it on the need at hand. Thank you for your input! P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 10:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]Replace Articles to be expanded
with {{#if:{{{nocat|}}}||Articles to be expanded}}
. JsfasdF252 (talk) 22:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]