User talk:206.167.168.128
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 13:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's cute so basically you allow lies and misleads to be the norm. and then you wonder why wikipedia is not a respected source of information. You will never be considered as a reliable source of information when you choose what pleases only a certain few
No i provided references, if its hurting your feelings and you cant accept the truth I wont let you change it. You are just proving that Wikipedia is nothing more than slightly more civilised 4chan
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:206.167.168.128 reported by User:Sro23 (Result: ). Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 17:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ~ Rob13Talk 01:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Weeknd— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff | Who, me? 21:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]