Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 |
Just so you know. I rewrote the article from scratch, so its current incarnation here on Sept 17th 2014 has no copyright issues, even though it is tagged as having them, but I'll understand if there are procedures to go through, such as possibly deleting older versions.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:30, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Do you have any suggestions should the ANI be closed as you predict? If ANI is broken, where do things like this get addressed? EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:30, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
HazelAB (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning vivation, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, User:TransporterMan (talk) 16:39, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Good work. I've moved it to mainspace. DS (talk) 14:13, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Nikkimaria (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello Renamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.
The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.
If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)
If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.
Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.
I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).
Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
A few months ago during the eventually unsuccessful Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Piotrus_3 you voted "neutral". You raised a number of interesting points. I wonder if you'd like to discuss them further or if you would have any suggestions in the event I'd decide to run again. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Contra poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
I don't think it is still going on. I think it is again going on. Same principle. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:21, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Reply on Editor assistance -- 183.171.181.186 (talk) 15:55, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Dont listen to any of the presumptions he have he had my wikias vandalized because i didn't or anyone agreed kami tenchi is omnipotent. Beyonder (talk) 14:04, 17 December 2014 (UTC)BeyonderGod
Thanks for uploading File:Aldrich logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Fluka logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Riedel-de Haën logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sigma logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Supelco logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Fee tail, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC) --MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Human-rating certification, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. JustinTime55 (talk) 17:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:CCTB.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:55, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Can you help with or give me some advice about the continued vandalism to the page Orchard Park (town), New York?Thanks BuffaloBob (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Det Norske Veritas 1-color.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Just want to stress that this isn't irony. I'd rather see you start a separate thread than engage in further speculation about sanctions against me.
Peter Isotalo 16:22, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Reformation (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Reformation (band) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 20:04, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Mendaliv,while I do agree there was emerging consensus to close the ANI discussion for Cleavage (breasts) [1], I think it was probably not a good idea for you, as an involved editor, to close it. It seems that no one so heavily involved should close such a contentious discussion. Also concerning is you closed an ANI discussion where your own behavior had been questioned by multiple editors as perhaps not appropriate. I think it would be more appropriate in this case to let an uninvolved editor close it. If you feel it's dragging on too long, perhaps post an WP:AN request for someone uninvolved to please come and close it. --BoboMeowCat (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey there! The Regenstein Library at the University of Chicago is hosting an edit-a-thon to celebrate Women's History Month on Saturday, March 28th from 10 AM to 4 PM. Coffee and lunch is provided for free, and we'll be focusing on building a few biographical and organizational articles. We'll also have full access to archival resources maintained by the Special Collections and Research Center. If you're interested in joining us, please RSVP at the event page here! Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by I JethroBT through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
What "Competence is required" does not mean[edit]It does not mean "come down hard like a ton of bricks on someone as soon as they make a mistake." JesseRafe (talk) 08:32, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:FFA logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:DunBradstreet.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Mendaliv, thanks for engaging with the requests page - it's great to have input from a wide audience on what resources we should pursue. Would you be interested in signing up to be a coordinator? We could use help with both distributing accounts to editors and reaching out to potential new partners. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:51, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DunBradstreet.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Many people think this article is a jokeNaytz (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Mendaliv We do put these notices on articles, see article on Reference Desk, and April Fools for example --Naytz (talk) 20:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Invisible rail shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Naytz (talk) 03:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey folks! We've got two exciting edit-a-thons happening in Chicago during the third week of April:
If you're interested in meeting up and working together with other Wikipedians at these fantastic institutions, please RSVP at the event pages linked above. If you know someone else interested in learning about or editing Wikipedia, invite them! We will provide training and resources for new editors at both events. For questions about the events, please refer to the event pages or contact I JethroBT (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT through MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
Hello Mendaliv,
You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Newspapers.com through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update, to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. Your input will help us to facilitate this particular partnership, and to discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thank you,
Wikipedia Library Newspapers.com account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 12:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Wikipedia Library Users,
You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thank you.Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:46, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Regarding Operation Starvation and this edit, you replied on the talk page indicating you objected to it. If you or another editor who had an interest in it do not respond, I intend to revert the article. As the talk page says, we can expand the section if we need to, but it appears unnecessary to me. 2601:8:9780:1EE:1CFE:53C:4ED0:76B2 (talk) 12:44, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
I have replied to your comment at Talk:Corfu_Channel_case#Disputed_references. 2601:8:9780:1EE:1CFE:53C:4ED0:76B2 (talk) 18:25, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Do you intend to reply regarding Talk:Corfu_Channel_case#Disputed_references? If you don't reply here or on the article talk page, I can only assume you no longer feel your objections to the edit are valid. 50.135.249.113 (talk) 07:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello!
You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello!
You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello Mendaliv,
You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Adam Matthew through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update, to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. Your input will help us to facilitate this particular partnership, and to discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thank you, Wikipedia Library Adam Matthew account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 13:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Interesting dismissive comment at your Oppose for the lede sentence RfC at United States. The reasoning "insufficient prominence to the ambiguity" is actually better than the notation itself. It would be instructive if you were to share what the American Jurisprudence Encyclopedia uses to define the geographic extent of the US in an RfC Comment.
American Jurisprudence is a tertiary reference, inferior by WP policy wp:psts to both primary sources and the six scholarly sources published in US and Canadian reliable sources.
I would appreciate your reconsidering the discussion and sources available for reference at Talk:United States#Mediation update Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/United States. Thanks for any additional time on this matter. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 12:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Tell you what -- let's see how the pageview numbers come in on the L.E.J article and also let's look at the pageview numbers for the Elijay redirect page. If pageview tallies start to shoot up, almost certainly it is not folks looking for a river or city in Georgia, but fans wanting to learn more about this hot French trio, and then we should change the redirect accordingly. Another option: turning Elijay into a disambiguation page, with links to the river, the city, and the French trio.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ University of Chicago on October 15! (drop-in any time, 3-7pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Mendaliv: Enjoy the holiday season and upcoming winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America1000 03:03, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indrani (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Indrani (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gott v. Berea College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bootlegger. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
dispute advice
Thank you quality work in resolving editor disputes your way, for quality work on articles such as Joliet Iron and Steel Works and Corfu Channel case, for dispute advice such as "try not just to win the argument, but also to win the respect of your opponent", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
This is in regards to the discussion that is going on in the Wikipedia Administrators' Notice Board. I just changed the title in the box of offices held from United States Secretary of State to Secretary of State. The title is not United States Secretary of State. The diplomats who hold the title are all Americans. so I think it's unnecessary to have United States Secretary of State, so I shortened it to Secretary of State, the actual title. There are secretaries of state in all 50 states who act as elections officers, but their full title is Secretary of State of Washington (for example). I saw that all the Secretaries of State, the foreign minister essentially had this long unncessary title, so I went through the Secretaries of State and changed the titles. Just explaining my position, and why I changed the titles. Best Regards NapoleonX (talk) 03:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Hippotherapy. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your edit summary did not assume good faith, and it is clear you are acting on behalf of a friend. jps (talk) 16:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi.
When you do something like this [4] without also reverting this, it presents an awkward situation for the editor you reverted. Either you lack the WP:COMPETENCE to follow the discussion clearly, or you're being WP:POINTy. Either way, the fact that you have contributed precisely zero to the discussion you reference means that your revert is, at the very least, ill-advised. Please fix the situation and join the conversation or I will revert you.
Thanks.
jps (talk)
Destiny Leo (talk) 09:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey Mendaliv! I've noticed that you are an alumni of the Notre Dame Law School. I work with the WikiProject Notre Dame, and I've been working on the notre Dame Law School page. Despite serious improvement, there is still a lot to do. I just wanted to know if you were interesting in participating and/or joining the Wikiproject. Cheers!
Eccekevin (talk) 20:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I removed your speedy deletion tag under WP:A7 on the article Jacquil Taylor because I don't believe it meets A7. Playing at a college-level team that's notable and already has a Wikipedia article plausibly demonstrates that more about the player could be found online or in print. A7 is really intended to apply only when the article is either so implausible or so unlikely to have sources to demonstrate notability that there's no point in going through a process like WP:AFD. As soon as there are any sources online, or any mention of being a player on a notable team, it doesn't meet A7 and needs to at a minimum go to WP:PROD. Particularly, when an editor (like me) challenges a speedy deletion, please go to a different deletion process. Don't go back to speedy deletion when it's clearly contested by other, non-involved editors. I suggest you look through this user essay, which explains a lot of scenarios where A7 doesn't apply such as "played for a notable team, even if only on minor or amateur level". Thanks! Appable (talk) 15:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Walther arms.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)