User talk:Super Dromaeosaurus/Archive 2
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Looking at the Athikkadai page history, it appears that when you wish to revert a sequence of edits you undo each individually. This is tedious and unnecessary. See the second para of WP:UNDO for one method for doing so more efficiently. The process is even simpler if you have Twinkle enabled. If you do decide to adopt any of these approaches, I'd recommend that you practice sing them WP:SANDBOX before applying them in mainspace. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Abecedare (talk) 21:05, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Маrsupipterinae. Since you had some involvement with the Маrsupipterinae redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 07:32, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Мarsupipterinae. Since you had some involvement with the Мarsupipterinae redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:14, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Onychopterella has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:18, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Istro-Romanians, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Resolution, Plague and Caravan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is to let you know that the Onychopterella article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 21, 2020. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 21, 2020, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted on or after October 1, 2018, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Adelophthalmidae
Thank you for quality articles about sea scorpions, such as Onychopterella, your first Featured article, for making Adelophthalmidae a Good topic, for articles about places such as Athikkadai and Romanian settlements, and people such as Antonio José Sánchez Mazuecos, all beginning with Pareques in 2017, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2333 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:49, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So it's been a few months since you asked me but I think I can finally present a satisfactory answer as to the origins of the Romanian Paleologu family and why they carried the last name of the old emperors; as per Donald M. Nicol's 1992 book The Immortal Emperor: The life and legend of Constantine Palaiologos, last Emperor of the Romans, which in its final chapters goes through multiple claimants to the old Palaiologos name in the centuries following Byzantium's fall, the Romanian Paleologu (and Palaiologoi in France and Malta descended from them) were genuine descendants of Greek people with the last name Palaiologos. Although several of the Paleologu apparently claimed to be descendants of Theodore II Palaiologos, Despot of the Morea and son of Emperor Manuel II, their actual descent can at most be traced to members of the Orthodox community in Constantinople being entrusted with governing positions in Wallachia and Moldavia by the Ottomans in the 18th century. Their ancestors, 18th century aristocrats in Constantinople with the last name Palaiologos, can't be proven to be descended from the emperors (as the family name was widespread in Byzantine times, not restricted to the ruling dynasty). The Paleologu thus are "true" Palaiologoi, but can't be proven to be of the imperial branch of the family.
That's not to say that "imperial blood" doesn't survive in Romania; the Palaiologoi were not the only Greek aristocrats sent there, some (which fared much better) with the last name Kantakouzenos were apparently (though some dispute exists) genuine descendants of Emperor John VI Kantakouzenos, who briefly usurped power from the Palaiologos dynasty in the 14th century. Their descendants survive to this day as the Cantacuzino family. I don't know if you're still interested in this or looking into it (you might have known all this already), but I thought I'd let you know what I found. Ichthyovenator (talk) 21:44, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Centenary March, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Entente (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Borchgrevinkium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Forfarella, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Posterior (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It states at the top of the edit page:
"Each addition now requires a direct citation from a reliable source on this page supporting it. Simply providing a wikilink is not sufficient and additions without direct sources will be removed."
You have now provided a source, so that's all fine. I only found out about this when I added something to one of these pages and had it reverted - only then did I read about the need for a citation. Mikenorton (talk) 16:15, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article Borchgrevinkium you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Borchgrevinkium for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 21:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Central Powers made a territorial compensation for Romania in the Treaty of Bucharest (1918), they granted Bessarabia to Romania. It doesn't matter that there was an earlier treaty about Bessarabia, because from the Central Power's viewpoint (and that was the only viewpoint of that treaty) this was the granted compensation for Romania.--Liltender (talk) 16:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australia–Romania relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commercial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article Borchgrevinkium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Borchgrevinkium for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 16:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roman Dacia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 19:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article Roman Dacia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Roman Dacia for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 05:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Forfarella, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Type locality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article Roman Dacia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Roman Dacia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 17:01, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Super Dromaeosaurus, pleased to make your acquaintance. I know that these links are entirely valid and not harmful. My revert is equally not harmful. All those external pages are now on archive and they can be linked whenever we please. There is no need for them just yet. The newspaper links stay alive for 5-10 years. Right now, the archive links add clutter to the page and make the editing harder. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 20:14, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Second Battle of Oituz. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 26#Second Battle of Oituz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The Banner talk 09:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oituz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Oituz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide WP:RS for this edit [1] or simply undo yourself. cheers, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 22:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, would you look on the current edits and on the talk, especially on that parts I was contested? Thank You(KIENGIR (talk) 16:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]
The article Guélengdeng has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There are two almost duplicate items. According to the [[2]], this city does not exist and this one does.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --KajenCAT (talk) 15:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Category:21st century in Gagauzia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Category:Years of the 21st century in Gagauzia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Category:Years in Gagauzia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Category:Centuries in Gagauzia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I will NOT accept you insult to my children. I will NOT FORGIVE IT!!! My children are not yet born but I am already very proud of them! They will all be good Christians and proud Magyar Patriots! What kind of children will YOU have? You must be one of those despicable "multi-cultural" people. You would allow your daughters to have sex with anyone, with Islamic enemies of Europe or with black immigrants from the African swamps or even with one of the Jewish servants of the Antichrist who have murdered Our Lord Jesus Christ! Yes, even with one of them! People like you have no shame, you have forgotten the lessons of two thousand years of Christianity! What children will you have? What grandchildren? Mongrels! Islamic Terrorists! Or even servants of the monstrous Elders of Zion, accomplices in the Jewish conspiracy to take over the world and destroy all decency! These are the shameful children and grandchildren which people like you will have! And YOU presume to pity ME? I pity you but I also despise and contempt you and all your Leftist Cosmopolitan friends! Ferenc Viktor Szabo (talk) 12:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)On the Glorious Day when the New Hungarian Army will march to Liberate Transylvania and the other territories which were stolen from us in Trianon and to assert the Rightful Leading Position of Our Hungarian Fatherland and the Glorious Magyar People at the Forefront of Humanity, I can be sure that my Patriotic Magyar Sons will be the forefront! And if one of them will happen to die as a Magyar Hero, I will grieve deeply but will also be immensely proud! And where will you and your shameful children and grandchildren be on that Glorious Day? You will go down under the feet of our Magyar heroes!!!Ferenc Viktor Szabo (talk) 12:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Union of Bulgaria and Romania you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 (talk) 07:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Flag of Cimișlia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 06:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Coat of arms of Cimișlia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 06:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I see that Jassy–Kishinev Offensive is now a disambiguation page. Please can you help to fix the resulting broken links? I've done most of them, but there are still about 100 where I wasn't sure which offensive is meant or the text may refer to both. Thanks, Certes (talk) 20:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Forfarella you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 02:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article Union of Bulgaria and Romania you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Union of Bulgaria and Romania for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 (talk) 04:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article Forfarella you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Forfarella for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 23:21, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article Union of Bulgaria and Romania you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Union of Bulgaria and Romania for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aza24 -- Aza24 (talk) 07:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and Greetings
While working on Draft:Avret Esir Pazarları female slavery markets in Ottomans, I came across an Ottoman escapee slave "George of Hungary" (actually a Romanian) His account of escape from slavery interests me. so I initiated a Draft:Georgius of Hungary’s Tractatus. Frankly I am not sure I can spare enough time alone for this particular article since I am focused on related larger scope project of Women , conflicts and conflict zones, So..
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku (talk) 16:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your suggestions, I have taken those in to account. regards Bookku (talk) 03:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi,
regarding you recent edit, it's a bit problematic, since every inhabitant of Germany cannot be considered German, since many Hungarian, Romanian, etc. other citizens living and working there, without German citizenship. The editor before you made modifications with good faith, however, maybe not so careful. I suggest you to modify to "any person inhabiting" -> German citizens (linking to German citizenship - this was the original intent), as well you may completely rewrite the user's addition ([7]) suffering from serious grammatical mistakes, on the other hand using redundant and repetitive wordage...
Hoever, in the current form, the lead is grammatically and logically failed, so I propose the repair like this e.g. (highlighted modified/missing parts):
"......urope, or denote German citizens, or native speakers of the German language, or who share a common German ancestry".
The ancestry has to be added since the infobox table lists German offsprings all around the world, etc., btw. it was part of the last stable version.
(disclaimer: if you disagree, please rollback the page to status quo ante, which I reset, since none of the current additions have consensus, however with your repairs we may tend to that direction)
Thanks for you time!(KIENGIR (talk) 14:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC))[reply]
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Union of Bulgaria and Romania has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Please read through it very carefully to be sure that I have not introduced any errors with my edits. In a number of places the language was unclear and I believe should have been clarified before the article was awarded GA status. I may have misinterpreted what I read. I happen to disagree with several of the suggested over linked terms made by the reviewer, but I have gone through the article an removed quite a few I do feel are unnecessary. (This can be awfully subjective depending on the individual reviewer.) I also wondered about the Northwest controversy. Is this construction worker someone of note? If not, it's difficult to believe his opinion caused such a fuss! You might want to consider trimming it. I would suggest you place the section before the Comparison section, though, so it seems less like an afterthought.Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am receiving discrimination and racism from an Aromanian Nationalist. Wikipedia is neutral and impartial and it should remain as it is.The user is known as MacedoRoman. This user does not allow me to add an Aromanian website in the Albanian language that is Pro-Romanian (Romanian - Aromanian: Aromanians that support that they are Romanians, they have Romanian national feelings). The Website is known as Arumun.com. Its main languages are Albanian and Romanian with support for articles in Aromanian. It is a very useful website for us Aromanians and it increases our ties with Romania, the motherland of our language (if I am not mistaken). I want the user mentioned above to stop removing Arumun.com and respect democracy as it is expressed from the European Union and the United States with freedom of Expression and Ideas between people's and countries. Do you kind sir have the ability to that or help me report him to the administrators of Wikipedia?Thank you in advance and I apologize for any inconvenience caused. Bolt Escargot (talk) 03:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why you add the website arumun.com again? This website is a romanian propoganda website! MacedoRoman (talk) 18:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I took care of your request at WP:RM/TR, but just wanted you to know, in case you don't already, that you should be able to do these kinds of moves yourself. As long as there is not more than one edit at the redirect that points back to the article to be moved, any autoconfirmed editor should be able to move that article over the redirect. Station1 (talk) 21:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So you're from ROMANIA???? Why then are you defending the Germans?? You're obviously a Gypsie because all Romanians are - it's where you get the name Romani. Didn't Hitler try to wipe you out as well before we came to your rescue? Wow. There is gratitude. Chestermoon (talk) 01:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and your all COMMIES, backward people, like Charchesku was. BUT I'm gonna grant you one thing, your GIRLS are damn beautiful and I love Rumanian girls. Chestermoon (talk) 01:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. What do we do with this isolated paragraph sentence, "President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev made a statement regarding the conflict"? I think the article should point out one or two things he said in the speech. --Coldtrack (talk) 23:03, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. While your comments at User talk:Jimmy Reverence couldn't be more accurate, and I've rarely seen an editor more deserving of an immediate indefinite block, still, once they *have* been blocked, there's a concept of no gravedancing (especially when they're blocked from responding on their own page), and I believe that's good manners, and also models WP:CIVILITY. No big deal, but just something to think about, going forward. Happy editing! Mathglot (talk) 01:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Super,
I wish you a Merry Christmas and as well La Multi Ani as for the next Year! Best Regards!(KIENGIR (talk) 15:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC))[reply]
Hello. I noticed that you reverted the removal of red-link entries in Template:Anti-Azerbaijanism and Template:Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. Links in navigation templates should be for pages that exist or are likely to exist. Please note that the red links in question were for article deleted from at AfD per editor consensus. In addition, Ballıqaya, Bashlibel and Shamakhi were deleted for notability and verifiability problems. Agdaban massacre was removed in a separate AfD for the same problems. Unless better supporting references are found, they are unlikely to return to Wikipedia without risking G4 speedy deletion, which already happened for Agdaban. Per WP:RED, these are red links that should not be in Wikipedia, and they are routinely cleaned up. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]