List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 130

This is a list of cases reported in volume 130 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1889.

Supreme Court of the United States
Map
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 235 years ago (1789-03-04)
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized byConstitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 130 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in volume 130 U.S. were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:

PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Melville FullerChief JusticeIllinoisMorrison WaiteJuly 20, 1888
(41–20)
October 8, 1888

July 4, 1910
(Died)
Samuel Freeman MillerAssociate JusticeIowaPeter Vivian DanielJuly 16, 1862
(Acclamation)
July 21, 1862

October 13, 1890
(Died)
Stephen Johnson FieldAssociate JusticeCalifornianewly-created seatMarch 10, 1863
(Acclamation)
May 10, 1863

December 1, 1897
(Retired)
Joseph P. BradleyAssociate JusticeNew Jerseynewly-created seatMarch 21, 1870
(46–9)
March 23, 1870

January 22, 1892
(Died)
John Marshall HarlanAssociate JusticeKentuckyDavid DavisNovember 29, 1877
(Acclamation)
December 10, 1877

October 14, 1911
(Died)
Stanley MatthewsAssociate JusticeOhioNoah Haynes SwayneMay 12, 1881
(24–23)
May 17, 1881

March 22, 1889
(Died)
Horace GrayAssociate JusticeMassachusettsNathan CliffordDecember 20, 1881
(51–5)
January 9, 1882

September 15, 1902
(Died)
Samuel BlatchfordAssociate JusticeNew YorkWard HuntMarch 22, 1882
(Acclamation)
April 3, 1882

July 7, 1893
(Died)
Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus LamarAssociate JusticeMississippiWilliam Burnham WoodsJanuary 16, 1888
(32–28)
January 18, 1888

January 23, 1893
(Died)

Notable Case in 130 U.S.

Chae Chan Ping v. United States

Chae Chan Ping v. United States, 130 U.S. 581 (1889), also known as the Chinese Exclusion Case, was a challenge to the Scott Act of 1888, an addendum to the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. One ground of challenge was conflict with the Burlingame Treaty of 1868 between the United States and China. The Supreme Court rejected the challenge and upheld the authority of the US federal government to set immigration policy and pass new legislation even if it overrode the terms of existing treaties. The decision was an important precedent for judicial deference to the plenary power of the legislative branch in immigration law, and federal authority to overturn the terms of international treaties.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 130 U.S.

Case NamePage & yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinion(s)Dissenting opinion(s)Lower courtDisposition
Oregon Railroad and Navigation Company v. Oregonian Railway Company, Ltd.1 (1889)MillernoneFieldC.C.D. Or.reversed
Badger v. Cusimano39 (1889)HarlannonenoneC.C.E.D. La.affirmed
Parker v. Dacres43 (1889)HarlannonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Wash.affirmed
Ballard v. Searls50 (1889)BradleynonenoneC.C.E.D. Mich.remanded
Collins Company v. Coes56 (1889)FullernonenoneC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
Arkansas Valley Land and Cattle Company v. Mann69 (1889)HarlannonenoneC.C.D. Colo.affirmed
United States v. Watson80 (1889)LamarnonenoneC.C.D.affirmed
Calton v. Utah83 (1889)HarlannonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Utahreversed
Brown v. District of Columbia87 (1889)FullernonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.affirmed
Richardson v. Green104 (1889)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.W.D. Mich.dismissed
Thompson v. Hall117 (1889)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.E.D.N.Y.affirmed
Moore v. Crawford122 (1889)FullernonenoneC.C.W.D. Mich.affirmed
Bullitt County v. Washer142 (1889)LamarnonenoneC.C.D. Ky.affirmed
Rude v. Westcott152 (1889)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Ind.reversed
Smith v. Adams167 (1889)FieldnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Dakotadismissed
Lyon v. Alley177 (1889)LamarnonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.affirmed
Williamson v. New Jersey189 (1889)BlatchfordnonenoneN.J. Sup. Ct.affirmed
The Alaska201 (1889)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Company v. Hopkins210 (1889)FullernonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.dismissed
District of Columbia v. Gannon227 (1889)FullernonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.dismissed
District of Columbia v. Emerson229 (1889)FullernonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.dismissed
Stevens v. Nichols230 (1889)HarlannonenoneC.C.W.D. Mo.reversed
Buxton v. Traver232 (1889)FieldnonenoneCal.affirmed
Botiller v. Dominguez238 (1889)MillernonenoneCal.reversed
Parley's Park Silver Mining Company v. Kerr256 (1889)LamarnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Utahaffirmed
United States v. Insley263 (1889)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Kan.reversed
Manhattan Bank v. Walker267 (1889)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.W.D. Tenn.reversed
United States v. Pile280 (1889)MillernonenoneC.C.M.D. Tenn.dismissed
Davies v. Miller284 (1889)GraynonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Hammer v. Garfield Mining and Milling Company291 (1889)FieldnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Mont.affirmed
Amy v. City of Watertown I301 (1889)BradleynonenoneC.C.W.D. Wis.affirmed
Amy v. City of Watertown II320 (1889)BradleynonenoneC.C.W.D. Wis.affirmed
Knowlton v. City of Watertown I327 (1889)BradleynonenoneC.C.W.D. Wis.affirmed
Knowlton v. City of Watertown II334 (1889)per curiamnonenoneC.C.W.D. Wis.affirmed
United States v. Averill335 (1889)BlatchfordnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Utahreversed
Brock v. Northwestern Fuel Company341 (1889)HarlannonenoneC.C.N.D. Iowareversed
In re Gon-Shay-Ee343 (1889)MillernonenoneD. Terr. Ariz.habeas corpus granted
In re Captain Jack353 (1889)Millernonenonenot indicatedhabeas corpus granted
Reynes v. F. Dumont and Company354 (1889)FullernonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Gibbs v. Consolidated Gas Company396 (1889)FullernonenoneC.C.D. Md.affirmed
Robertson v. Salomon412 (1889)BradleynonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Friedlander and Company v. Texas and Pacific Railway Company416 (1889)FullernonenoneC.C.E.D. Tex.affirmed
Shepherd v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company426 (1889)HarlannonenoneC.C.S.D. Ohioreversed
Town of Andes v. Slauson435 (1889)GraynonenoneC.C.N.D.N.Y.affirmed
Badeau v. United States439 (1889)FullernonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
United States v. Cumming452 (1889)HarlannonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Hurlbut v. Schillinger456 (1889)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Wilson v. Edmonds472 (1889)BlatchfordnonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.affirmed
Central Trust Company v. Seasongood482 (1889)HarlannonenoneC.C.S.D. Ohioaffirmed
Hassall v. Wilcox493 (1889)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.W.D. Tex.reversed
Kilbourn v. Sunderland505 (1889)FullernonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.multiple
Stillwell and Bierce Manufacturing Company v. Phelps520 (1889)GraynonenoneC.C.E.D. Wis.affirmed
Butler v. Boston and Savannah Steamship Company527 (1889)BradleynonenoneC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
Huling v. Kaw Valley Railway and Improvement Company559 (1889)MillernonenoneC.C.D. Kan.affirmed
Union Trust Company v. Southern Inland Navigation and Improvement Company565 (1889)HarlannonenoneC.C.N.D. Fla.affirmed
Synnott v. Shaughnessy572 (1889)LamarnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Idahoaffirmed
Chae Chan Ping v. United States581 (1889)FieldnonenoneC.C.N.D. Cal.affirmed
New York and Colorado Mining Syndicate and Company v. Fraser611 (1889)LamarnonenoneC.C.D. Colo.affirmed
Redfield v. Parks623 (1889)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.E.D. Ark.certiorari issued
Peters v. Active Manufacturing Company626 (1889)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D. Ohioaffirmed
McKinley v. Wheeler630 (1889)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Colo.reversed
Pickard v. East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia Railway Company637 (1889)FieldnonenoneC.C.M.D. Tenn.reversed
Andrus v. St. Louis Smelting and Refining Company643 (1889)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Colo.affirmed
Dunlap v. Northeastern Railroad Company649 (1889)FullernonenoneC.C.N.D. Ga.reversed
United States v. Haynes653 (1889)GraynonenoneC.C.W.D. Tex.dismissed
District of Columbia v. Cornell655 (1889)GraynonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Lake County v. Rollins662 (1889)LamarnonenoneC.C.D. Colo.reversed
Lake County v. Graham674 (1889)LamarnonenoneC.C.D. Colo.reversed
Jones v. Van Doren684 (1889)GraynonenoneC.C.D. Minn.reversed
Michigan Ins. Bank v. Eldred693 (1889)GraynonenoneC.C.E.D. Wis.reversed
Hill v. Harding699 (1889)GraynonenoneIll.affirmed

Notes and references

External links