List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 275

This is a list of cases reported in volume 275 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1927 and 1928.

Supreme Court of the United States
Map
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 235 years ago (1789-03-04)
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized byConstitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 275 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in volume 275 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:

PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
William Howard TaftChief JusticeConnecticutEdward Douglass WhiteJune 30, 1921
(Acclamation)
July 11, 1921

February 3, 1930
(Retired)
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.Associate JusticeMassachusettsHorace GrayDecember 4, 1902
(Acclamation)
December 8, 1902

January 12, 1932
(Retired)
Willis Van DevanterAssociate JusticeWyomingEdward Douglass White (as Associate Justice)December 15, 1910
(Acclamation)
January 3, 1911

June 2, 1937
(Retired)
James Clark McReynoldsAssociate JusticeTennesseeHorace Harmon LurtonAugust 29, 1914
(44–6)
October 12, 1914

January 31, 1941
(Retired)
Louis BrandeisAssociate JusticeMassachusettsJoseph Rucker LamarJune 1, 1916
(47–22)
June 5, 1916

February 13, 1939
(Retired)
George SutherlandAssociate JusticeUtahJohn Hessin ClarkeSeptember 5, 1922
(Acclamation)
October 2, 1922

January 17, 1938
(Retired)
Pierce ButlerAssociate JusticeMinnesotaWilliam R. DayDecember 21, 1922
(61–8)
January 2, 1923

November 16, 1939
(Died)
Edward Terry SanfordAssociate JusticeTennesseeMahlon PitneyJanuary 29, 1923
(Acclamation)
February 19, 1923

March 8, 1930
(Died)
Harlan F. StoneAssociate JusticeNew YorkJoseph McKennaFebruary 5, 1925
(71–6)
March 2, 1925

July 2, 1941
(Continued as chief justice)

Notable Case in 275 U.S.

An 1886 advertisement for "Magic Washer" detergent: The Chinese Must Go

Lum v. Rice

In Lum v. Rice, 275 U.S. 78 (1927), the Supreme Court upheld blatant de jure discrimination against Asian-Americans, holding that the exclusion on account of race of a child of Chinese ancestry from a public school did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[2] The decision effectively approved the exclusion of any minority children from schools reserved for whites.[3] Earl Brewer, a former governor of Mississippi, represented the Lums, arguing that forcing their girls to attend the inferior school for non-white children violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights, and that since they were not Black they should be allowed to attend the schools for whites. He was able to win the writ of mandamus they sought, but then the school district appealed to the Mississippi Supreme Court which unanimously reversed the lower court, holding that Mississippi's constitution and laws clearly distinguished Asians ("Mongolians", it called them) from whites, so the Lums could not attend white schools. On review in the U.S. Supreme Court, Chief Justice William Howard Taft's unanimous opinion ended with a pronouncement that all racial segregation in schools was constitutional. While it was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education a quarter-century later, it gave greater legal foundation to educational segregation in the short term and set back efforts to end it. It is remembered today for increasing the scope of permissible segregation. Historian and educator James Loewen called Lum "the most racist Supreme Court decision in the twentieth century".[2] Legal scholar Jamal Greene has called it an "ugly and unfortunate" decision. "The Court's ruling had established a precedent more powerful than the Lum family could have imagined", observed Adrienne Berard, in Water Tossing Boulders, a history of the case. "By fighting, they had only made the enemy stronger."[2]

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari. On January 1, 1912, the effective date of the Judicial Code of 1911, the old Circuit Courts were abolished, with their remaining trial court jurisdiction transferred to the U.S. District Courts.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 275 U.S.

Case NamePage and yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinion(s)Dissenting opinion(s)Lower CourtDisposition
United States ex rel. Skinner and Eddy Corporation v. McCarl1 (1927)BrandeisnonenoneD.C. Cir.affirmed
Mammoth Oil Company v. United States13 (1927)Butlernonenone8th Cir.affirmed
Smallwood v. Gallardo56 (1927)Holmesnonenone1st Cir.reversed
Gallardo v. Santini Fertilizer Company62 (1927)HolmesnonenoneD.P.R.reversed
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Southwell64 (1927)HolmesnonenoneN.C.reversed
Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Goodman66 (1927)Holmesnonenone6th Cir.reversed
Fairmont Creamery Company v. Minnesota70 (1927)Taftnonenoneoriginaltaxing costs denied
Lum v. Rice78 (1927)TaftnonenoneMiss.affirmed
Compañía General de Tabacos v. Collector87 (1927)TaftnoneHolmesPhil.multiple
Wickwire v. Reinecke101 (1927)Taftnonenone7th Cir.reversed
Segurola v. United States106 (1927)Taftnonenone1st Cir.affirmed
Simmons v. Swan113 (1927)Holmesnonenone1st Cir.reversed
Mercantile Trust Company v. Wilmot Road District117 (1927)Holmesnonenone8th Cir.reversed
Leach and Company v. Peirson120 (1927)Holmesnonenone3d Cir.reversed
Millsaps College v. City of Jackson129 (1927)McReynoldsnonenoneMiss.affirmed
Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Moser133 (1927)McReynoldsnonenoneTex. Civ. App.reversed
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Wisconsin136 (1927)McReynoldsnonenoneWis.reversed
Blodgett v. Holden142 (1927)McReynoldsHolmesnone6th Cir.certification
United States v. Berkeness149 (1927)McReynoldsnonenone9th Cir.affirmed
St. Louis–San Francisco Railway Company v. Spiller156 (1927)Brandeisnonenoneoriginalamendment denied
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company v. Wells Dickey Trust Company161 (1927)BrandeisnonenoneMinn.reversed
City of Hammond v. Schappi Bus Line, Inc.164 (1927)Brandeisnonenone7th Cir.decree modified
City of Hammond v. Farina Bus Line Transportation Company173 (1927)Brandeisnonenone7th Cir.decree modified
Mason v. Routzahn175 (1927)Brandeisnonenone6th Cir.reversed
News Syndicate Company v. New York Central Railroad Company179 (1927)Butlernonenone7th Cir.certification
Atwater and Company v. United States188 (1927)ButlernonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Marron v. United States192 (1927)Butlernonenone9th Cir.affirmed
Steele v. Drummond199 (1927)Butlernonenone5th Cir.affirmed
Washington ex rel. Stimson Lumber Company v. Kuykendall207 (1927)ButlernonenoneWash.affirmed
Mellon v. O'Neil212 (1927)SanfordnonenoneN.Y. Sup. Ct.dismissed
Willcuts v. Milton Dairy Company215 (1927)Sanfordnonenone8th Cir.reversed
Blair v. Oesterlein Machine Company220 (1927)StonenonenoneD.C. Cir.affirmed
Tucker v. Alexander228 (1927)Stonenonenone8th Cir.reversed
Heiner v. Colonial Trust Company232 (1927)Stonenonenone3d Cir.reversed
Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Ellzey236 (1927)Stonenonenone5th Cir.reversed
Lewellyn v. Electricity Reduction Company243 (1927)Stonenonenone3d Cir.reversed
Equitable Trust Company v. Rochling248 (1927)Stonenonenone2d Cir.reversed
Latzko v. Equitable Trust Company254 (1927)Stonenonenone2d Cir.reversed
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Standard Oil Company257 (1927)Taftnonenone6th Cir.multiple
Bothwell v. Buckbee Mears Company274 (1927)BrandeisnonenoneMinn.affirmed
New Mexico v. Texas279 (1927)Sanfordnonenoneoriginalboundary set
Robins Dry Dock Repair Company v. Flint303 (1927)Holmesnonenone2d Cir.reversed
Gambino v. United States310 (1927)Brandeisnonenone2d Cir.reversed
Temco Electric Motor Company v. Apco Manufacturing Company319 (1928)Taftnonenone5th Cir.reversed
Richmond Screw Anchor Company v. United States331 (1928)TaftnonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
United States v. Murray347 (1928)Taftnonenone5th Cir.multiple
Equitable Trust Company v. First National Bank359 (1928)HolmesnoneStone2d Cir.reversed
Barber Asphalt Paving Company v. Standard Asphalt and Rubber Company372 (1928)VanDevanternonenone7th Cir.reversed
The Steel Trader388 (1928)McReynoldsnonenone5th Cir.reversed
Hopkins v. Southern California Telephone Company393 (1928)McReynoldsnonenone9th Cir.affirmed
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company v. United States404 (1928)BrandeisnonenoneN.D. Ill.affirmed
Emergency Fleet Corporation v. Western Union Telegraph Company415 (1928)BrandeisnonenoneD.C. Cir.reversed
Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Aeby426 (1928)ButlernonenoneMo.reversed
N. and G. Taylor Company, Inc. v. Anderson431 (1928)Butlernonenone7th Cir.affirmed
Aetna Insurance Company v. Hyde440 (1928)ButlernonenoneMo.dismissed
Roche v. McDonald449 (1928)SanfordnonenoneWash.reversed
Gulf, Mobile and Northern Railroad Company v. Wells455 (1928)SanfordnonenoneMiss.reversed
Mellon v. Arkansas Land and Lumber Company460 (1928)SanfordnonenoneArk.reversed
Jackson v. Steamship Archimedes463 (1928)Sanfordnonenone2d Cir.affirmed
Ingram Day Lumber Company v. McLouth471 (1928)Stonenonenone6th Cir.reversed
Nagle v. Loi Hoa475 (1928)Stonenonenone9th Cir.reversed
E.W. Bliss Company v. United States509 (1927)per curiamnonenoneCt. Cl.reversed

Notes and references

External links