User contributions for 134.201.96.96

    For 134.201.96.96 talk block log logs filter log
    Search for contributionsshowhide
    ⧼contribs-top⧽
    ⧼contribs-date⧽
    (newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

    22 April 2019

    15 November 2017

    4 November 2017

    6 October 2017

    • 19:5519:55, 6 October 2017diff hist −8 KaabaThe photo was not taken during Hajj, as the people are not wearing all white, and clearly the masjid is not filled to capacity with millions of people.

    14 August 2017

    8 August 2017

    3 August 2017

    • 19:1119:11, 3 August 2017diff hist −1,606 Dynasty (sports)The word "dynasty" should not be used for a string of several dominant years in a row, unless the number of years that the league has existed is small making several years of dominance a large percentage.
    • 14:1714:17, 3 August 2017diff hist −1,606 Dynasty (sports)According to this article, "The word "dynasty" should not be used for a string of several dominant years in a row", extraordinary length of time like a decade. "championships over a very long period of time, either consecutively "

    12 July 2017

    9 May 2017

    27 April 2017

    17 April 2017

    30 March 2017

    21 March 2017

    18 January 2017

    20 December 2016

    2 December 2016

    • 16:2916:29, 2 December 2016diff hist −1,606 Dynasty (sports)According to this article, "The word "dynasty" should not be used for a string of several dominant years in a row", extraordinary length of time like a decade. "championships over a very long period of time, either consecutively "

    15 November 2016

    5 October 2016

    4 October 2016

    20 September 2016

    • 15:5615:56, 20 September 2016diff hist −1,606 Dynasty (sports)According to this article, "The word "dynasty" should not be used for a string of several dominant years in a row", extraordinary length of time like a decade. "championships over a very long period of time, either consecutively "

    13 September 2016

    12 July 2016

    30 June 2016

    23 June 2016

    28 March 2016

    11 March 2016

    8 February 2016

    • 21:4421:44, 8 February 2016diff hist −1,802 Dynasty (sports)According to this article, "The word "dynasty" should not be used for a string of several dominant years in a row", extraordinary length of time like a decade. "championships over a very long period of time"

    9 December 2015

    • 18:1418:14, 9 December 2015diff hist −1,802 Dynasty (sports)According to this article, "The word "dynasty" should not be used for a string of several dominant years in a row", extraordinary length of time like a decade. "championships over a very long period of time, either consecutively "
    • 13:2213:22, 9 December 2015diff hist −1,802 Dynasty (sports)According to THIS article, Dynasty is several dominant years in a row, not every other year like the SF Giants. The length of time should be like a decade. Giants are not a dynasty according to this article.

    8 December 2015

    • 22:2722:27, 8 December 2015diff hist −1,802 Dynasty (sports)According to THIS article, Dynasty is several dominant years in a row, not every other year like the SF Giants. The length of time should be like a decade. Giants are not a dynasty according to this article.
    • 14:0914:09, 8 December 2015diff hist −1,802 Dynasty (sports)According to THIS article, Dynasty is several dominant years in a row, not every other year like the SF Giants. The length of time should be like a decade. Giants are not a dynasty according to this article.
    • 13:5113:51, 8 December 2015diff hist −1,802 Dynasty (sports)According to THIS article, Dynasty is several dominant years in a row, not every other year like the SF Giants. The length of time should be like a decade. Giants are not a dynasty according to this article.

    7 December 2015

    • 19:0419:04, 7 December 2015diff hist −1,802 Dynasty (sports)According to THIS article, Dynasty is several dominant years in a row, not every other year like the SF Giants. The length of time should be like a decade. Giants are not a dynasty according to this article.
    • 17:1117:11, 7 December 2015diff hist −1,802 Dynasty (sports)According to THIS article, Dynasty is several dominant years in a row, not every other year like the SF Giants. The length of time should be like a decade. Giants are not a dynasty according to this article.

    20 November 2015

    • 19:4919:49, 20 November 2015diff hist −1,802 Dynasty (sports)According to THIS article, Dynasty is several dominant years in a row, not every other year like the SF Giants. The length of time should be like a decade. Giants are not a dynasty according to this article.
    • 13:5713:57, 20 November 2015diff hist −1,802 Dynasty (sports)According to THIS article, Dynasty is several dominant years in a row, not every other year like the SF Giants. The length of time should be like a decade. Giants are not a dynasty according to this article.

    19 November 2015

    18 November 2015

    • 20:4520:45, 18 November 2015diff hist −749 Dynasty (sports)According to this article, "The word "dynasty" should not be used for a string of several dominant years in a row", extraordinary length of time like a decade. "championships over a very long period of time, either consecutively "
    • 19:0619:06, 18 November 2015diff hist −1,802 Dynasty (sports)According to this article, "The word "dynasty" should not be used for a string of several dominant years in a row", extraordinary length of time like a decade. "championships over a very long period of time, either consecutively "
    (newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)