User contributions for 195.191.66.227

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

18:1618:16, 9 August 2016diff hist 0‎ Roxana‎No edit summary

14:3814:38, 15 December 2015diff hist +4,593‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents‎ Undid revision 695359314 by RickinBaltimore (talk)
14:3414:34, 15 December 2015diff hist +3,648‎ Wikipedia talk:Reference desk‎ "It is certainly suspect to block for sockpuppetry alone without a statement as to who the editor is a sockpuppet of. It would be difficult for the community to review such a block." - ArbCom. So ... zzuuzz ... asleep at the switch, as usual.
14:3414:34, 15 December 2015diff hist +2,678‎ User talk:StuRat‎ "It is certainly suspect to block for sockpuppetry alone without a statement as to who the editor is a sockpuppet of. It would be difficult for the community to review such a block." - ArbCom. So ... zzuuzz ... asleep at the switch, as usual.
14:3414:34, 15 December 2015diff hist +744‎ Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 December 12‎ "It is certainly suspect to block for sockpuppetry alone without a statement as to who the editor is a sockpuppet of. It would be difficult for the community to review such a block." - ArbCom. So ... zzuuzz ... asleep at the switch, as usual.
14:3414:34, 15 December 2015diff hist +4,593‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents‎ "It is certainly suspect to block for sockpuppetry alone without a statement as to who the editor is a sockpuppet of. It would be difficult for the community to review such a block." - ArbCom. So ... zzuuzz ... asleep at the switch, as usual.

16:5616:56, 3 December 2015diff hist −2‎ Bradley Wiggins‎ →‎External links

07:4707:47, 24 August 2015diff hist +259‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents‎ Note that Vote (X) for Change was unbanned many years ago and the editors (other than the OP) who contributed to the discussion were all heavily involved, as was NeilN who closed it (naughty boy!) and also protected the article claiming it was "infested".
07:4707:47, 24 August 2015diff hist +509‎ User talk:86.145.209.15‎ Note that Vote (X) for Change was unbanned many years ago and the editors (other than the OP) who contributed to the discussion were all heavily involved, as was NeilN who closed it and also protected the article, claiming it was "infested".
07:4707:47, 24 August 2015diff hist +281‎ Talk:Prime meridian (Greenwich)‎ Note that Vote (X) for Change was unbanned many years ago and the editors (other than the OP) who contributed to the discussion were all heavily involved, as was NeilN who closed it (naughty boy!) and also protected the article claiming it was "infested"
07:4707:47, 24 August 2015diff hist +281‎ Talk:Time ball‎ Note that Vote (X) for Change was unbanned many years ago and the editors (other than the OP) who contributed to the discussion were all heavily involved, as was NeilN who closed it (naughty boy!) and also protected the article claiming it was "infested".

07:2707:27, 1 August 2015diff hist +2,271‎ User talk:Jimbo Wales‎ Anyone can post here.It's time to ring down the curtain on the reign of terror emanating from administrators who think the rules on sourcing and relevance don't apply to them.See the ongoing discussion at WP:RDL#July 27 Vowel hiatus in German spelling

07:5707:57, 27 July 2015diff hist +1,855‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)‎ Future Perfect at Sunrise does have WP:CIR issues.He removed a bundle of references from a page with no edit summary which another editor had to add back.JoeSperrazza also has WP:CIR issues.He changed "movie" to "movi.e." and similar needing rv.

13:5413:54, 25 July 2015diff hist +231‎ Time (Freddie Mercury song)‎No edit summary

14:1914:19, 16 July 2015diff hist −1‎ Nasim Ali‎ →‎Early career

08:1208:12, 13 July 2015diff hist −298‎ Talk:Islamic calendar‎ Undid revision 671219598 by Sjö (talk)You should be able to see from the edit summary that the favourable unban discussion was simply ignored.
08:0508:05, 13 July 2015diff hist +185‎ User talk:156.61.160.1‎ More drivel from JoeSperrazza, the guy who says Jc3s5h is a sock. The IP was in use before the account was registered so it can't be a sock, although that would be too simple for Sperrazza to grasp. Per Risker, there is no socking.
08:0108:01, 13 July 2015diff hist +184‎ User:62.140.210.158‎ More drivel from JoeSperrazza, the guy who says Jc3s5h is a sock. The IP was in use before the account was registered so it can't be a sock, although that would be too simple for Sperrazza to grasp. Per Risker, there is no socking.
07:5907:59, 13 July 2015diff hist +185‎ User talk:62.140.210.158‎ Morer drivel from JoeSperrazza, the guy who says Jc3s5h is a sock. The IP was in use before the account was registered so it can't be a sock, although that would be too simple for Sperrazza to grasp. Per Risker, there is no socking.
07:5407:54, 13 July 2015diff hist −164‎ User:156.61.160.1‎ More drivel from JoeSperrazza, the guy who says Jc3s5h is a sock. The IP was in use before the account was registered, so it can't be a sock, although that would be too simple for Sperrazza to grasp. Per Risker there is no socking.
07:4207:42, 13 July 2015diff hist −298‎ Talk:Islamic calendar‎ The alleged sockmaster was unbanned years ago. In a place where a heavily - involved administrator can block as soon as an impartial SPI clerk sets out the evidence requirement for the case to succeed the positive unban discussion is simply ignored.
07:4207:42, 13 July 2015diff hist +431‎ Template talk:Year in various calendars‎ The alleged sockmaster was unblocked years ago. In a place where a heavily - involved administrator can block as soon as an impartial SPI clerk sets out the evidence requirement for the case to succeed the positive unban discussion is simply ignored.
07:4107:41, 13 July 2015diff hist −302‎ Talk:Julian calendar‎ The alleged sockmaster was unbanned years ago. In a place where a heavily - involved administrator can block as soon as an impartial SPI clerk sets out the evidence requirement for the case to succeed the positive unban discussion is simply ignored.
07:4107:41, 13 July 2015diff hist +958‎ Contraction (grammar)‎ The alleged sockmaster was unbanned years ago. In a place where a heavily - involved administrator can block as soon as an impartial SPI clerk sets out the evidence requirement for the case to succeed the positive unban discussion is simply ignored.
07:4107:41, 13 July 2015diff hist −306‎ Talk:Universal Time‎ The alleged sockmaster was unbanned years ago. In a place where a heavily - involved administrator can block as soon as an impartial SPI clerk sets out the evidence requirement for the case to succeed the positive unban discussion is simply ignored.
07:4107:41, 13 July 2015diff hist +200‎ Talk:Greenwich Mean Time‎ The alleged sockmaster was unbanned years ago. In a place where a heavily - involved administrator can block as soon as an impartial SPI clerk sets out the evidence requirement for the case to succeed the positive unban discussion is simply ignored.
07:4007:40, 13 July 2015diff hist +99‎ Talk:Hijrah‎ Undid revision by Special:Contributions/AstroLynx (talk) JoeSperrazza is not an administrator.
07:4007:40, 13 July 2015diff hist +1,017‎ Wikipedia:Closure requests‎ The alleged sockmaster was unbanned years ago. In a place where a heavily - involved administrator can block as soon as an impartial SPI clerk sets out the evidence requirement for the case to succeed the positive unban discussion is simply ignored.