21 February 2010
- 08:2308:23, 21 February 2010diff hist +47 Talk:Rachel Carson →Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
- 08:1708:17, 21 February 2010diff hist +96 Talk:Rachel Carson →Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
- 08:1608:16, 21 February 2010diff hist +209 Talk:Rachel Carson →Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
- 08:1308:13, 21 February 2010diff hist −2 Rachel Carson m - someone apparently accidentally reverted the change I made removing (POV) sarcasm quotes when they made some other change
- 01:5401:54, 21 February 2010diff hist +154 User talk:Cronos1 →Rachel Carson
- 01:5201:52, 21 February 2010diff hist +1 Talk:Rachel Carson →Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
- 01:5201:52, 21 February 2010diff hist +222 Talk:Rachel Carson →Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
20 February 2010
- 22:1722:17, 20 February 2010diff hist +687 Talk:Rachel Carson →Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
- 21:3621:36, 20 February 2010diff hist +422 Talk:Rachel Carson →Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
- 21:3321:33, 20 February 2010diff hist +623 Talk:Rachel Carson →Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
- 21:2921:29, 20 February 2010diff hist +334 Talk:Nolan Chart →Nonsensical
- 21:2621:26, 20 February 2010diff hist +605 Talk:Nolan Chart →Biased towards American politics
- 21:1421:14, 20 February 2010diff hist +1,037 Talk:Rachel Carson →Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
- 21:0321:03, 20 February 2010diff hist +724 User talk:Yilloslime →Rachel Carson: new section
- 20:5220:52, 20 February 2010diff hist +559 Talk:Rachel Carson →Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
- 20:4820:48, 20 February 2010diff hist +44 Rachel Carson Once again, trying to pacify Carson-lovers, getting rid of the POV impression that critic is conservative. Trying yet another wording alternative.
- 20:4420:44, 20 February 2010diff hist +213 Talk:Rachel Carson →Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
- 20:3720:37, 20 February 2010diff hist +850 Talk:Rachel Carson →Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions: new section
- 20:2220:22, 20 February 2010diff hist −1 User talk:Cronos1 →Rachel Carson
- 20:2220:22, 20 February 2010diff hist +172 User talk:Cronos1 →Rachel Carson
- 18:2618:26, 20 February 2010diff hist +26 User talk:Cronos1 →Rachel Carson
- 18:2518:25, 20 February 2010diff hist +346 User talk:Cronos1 →Rachel Carson
- 18:1618:16, 20 February 2010diff hist 0 Rachel Carson m - typo
- 18:1518:15, 20 February 2010diff hist +304 Rachel Carson Re-added the Driessen reference, which was deleted without comment.
- 18:0718:07, 20 February 2010diff hist −2 Rachel Carson sarcasm quotes have been replaced without comment, and are NPOV problem
- 18:0118:01, 20 February 2010diff hist +305 User talk:Cronos1 →Rachel Carson
- 17:5917:59, 20 February 2010diff hist +2 Rachel Carson m - more punctuation
- 17:5817:58, 20 February 2010diff hist −4 Rachel Carson m - punctuation
- 17:5817:58, 20 February 2010diff hist +104 Rachel Carson Once again, reworded differently, in such a way that does not make it look like the only criticism is from conservatives.
- 17:5517:55, 20 February 2010diff hist +546 Talk:Rachel Carson →Conservative criticism of Carson in Legacy section
- 17:5217:52, 20 February 2010diff hist +1,001 User talk:Cronos1 →Rachel Carson: new section
- 10:1110:11, 20 February 2010diff hist −13 Rachel Carson removed NPOV, unnecessary ad hominem attack on critics by labeling them all conservative, many of whom are NOT
- 10:0810:08, 20 February 2010diff hist +467 Talk:Rachel Carson →Conservative criticism of Carson in Legacy section
- 09:5909:59, 20 February 2010diff hist 0 Rachel Carson m - typo
- 09:5809:58, 20 February 2010diff hist +308 Rachel Carson →Further reading
- 09:4409:44, 20 February 2010diff hist +10 The Yes Men POV - sounds like violence. Youtube video shows that the encounter was playful
- 09:3909:39, 20 February 2010diff hist +9 The Yes Men It was not paint, which was thrown on them, it was colored powder, and this can be verified on youtube.
- 09:2909:29, 20 February 2010diff hist −2 Human Events replaced confusing definite article with better indefinite article
- 09:2809:28, 20 February 2010diff hist −5 Human Events m - removed unnecessary and confusing extra word
- 09:2309:23, 20 February 2010diff hist −2 Rachel Carson NPOV - removed sarcasm quotes
- 09:0909:09, 20 February 2010diff hist +274 Talk:Silent Spring →"Criticisms"?
- 08:5808:58, 20 February 2010diff hist +262 Talk:Silent Spring →"Criticisms"?
- 04:5104:51, 20 February 2010diff hist +124 User talk:206.124.6.222No edit summary
- 04:5104:51, 20 February 2010diff hist −6,060 User talk:206.124.6.222 →February 2010
12 February 2010
- 00:0200:02, 12 February 2010diff hist −112 User talk:206.124.6.222 →February 2010
- 00:0100:01, 12 February 2010diff hist +13 User talk:206.124.6.222 →February 2010
- 00:0000:00, 12 February 2010diff hist +259 User talk:206.124.6.222 →February 2010
11 February 2010
🔥 Top keywords: Main PageSpecial:SearchPage 3Wikipedia:Featured picturesHouse of the DragonUEFA Euro 2024Bryson DeChambeauJuneteenthInside Out 2Eid al-AdhaCleopatraDeaths in 2024Merrily We Roll Along (musical)Jonathan GroffJude Bellingham.xxx77th Tony AwardsBridgertonGary PlauchéKylian MbappéDaniel RadcliffeUEFA European Championship2024 ICC Men's T20 World CupUnit 731The Boys (TV series)Rory McIlroyN'Golo KantéUEFA Euro 2020YouTubeRomelu LukakuOpinion polling for the 2024 United Kingdom general electionThe Boys season 4Romania national football teamNicola CoughlanStereophonic (play)Gene WilderErin DarkeAntoine GriezmannProject 2025