User contributions for 24.243.178.144

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

03:3303:33, 26 September 2018diff hist +155‎ User talk:24.243.178.144‎ →‎Nice to see that administrators couldn't care less about Wikipedia rules: new sectioncurrent
02:5502:55, 26 September 2018diff hist +167‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard‎ →‎https://www.search.com.vn/wiki/en/Chuck_Grassley: new section
02:3102:31, 26 September 2018diff hist −631‎ Chuck Grassley‎ Undid revision 861238352 by PohranicniStraze (talk)Follow the rules and justify your violation of Wikipedia rules.Tags: Undo references removed
01:5901:59, 26 September 2018diff hist −631‎ Chuck Grassley‎ Undid revision 861228482 by Cannolis (talk)Once again, multiple editors are violating Wikipedia rules. I am being ignored when I make an accusation that these additions are from a biased source and comply with the rules to eliminate them. STOP UNDOING MY REVISIONS AND JUSTIFY YOUR POSITION.Tags: Undo references removed

23:0523:05, 25 September 2018diff hist −631‎ Chuck Grassley‎ Undid revision 861184973 by Power~enwiki (talk)Tags: Undo references removed
17:4417:44, 25 September 2018diff hist −631‎ Chuck Grassley‎ Undid revision 861122180 by ANode (talk)How about you try following Wikipedia's rules on material from biased sources, especially when the material has nothing to do with the subject of the Article? What does Steele's motivation have to do with Chuck Grassley?Tags: Undo references removed
02:0702:07, 25 September 2018diff hist −631‎ Chuck Grassley‎ Try justifying when you undo well-reasoned and Wikipedia compliant revisions.Tag: references removed

00:1400:14, 23 September 2018diff hist −61‎ Chuck Grassley‎ Undid revision 860775806 by PohranicniStraze (talk) You completely ignored everything I said in my revision. (1) I accused you of violating Wikipedia policy. (2) You ignored the fact that that source is widely recognized as biased, thus requiring greater scrutiny or at elimination of its contribution to the article. (3) You didn't account for the evidence to the contrary that I referred to.Tag: Undo

23:5223:52, 22 September 2018diff hist −61‎ Chuck Grassley‎ Undid revision 860771980 by PohranicniStraze (talk) You are violating Wikipedia's POV policy. https://www.search.com.vn/wiki/en/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Bias_in_sources The New York Times is a biased source that has been thoroughly discredited on multiple occasions and the citation to the source article is obvious hyperbole. The FBI terminated Steele as a source for violating their policy.Tag: Undo
23:2723:27, 22 September 2018diff hist −61‎ Chuck Grassley‎ Steele never sought to do anything other than make money and help Hilary Clinton get elected.