User contributions for 38.87.50.131

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

01:2201:22, 2 August 2021diff hist −5,784‎ User talk:38.87.50.131‎ ←Blanked the pagecurrentTag: Blanking

04:5304:53, 28 July 2021diff hist +113‎ Talk:Arcology‎ combined paragraphs to make indenting uniform, no content change except added signature
04:5204:52, 28 July 2021diff hist +1,311‎ Talk:Arcology‎No edit summary

22:1622:16, 19 July 2021diff hist +1,953‎ Talk:Arcology‎No edit summary
21:5121:51, 19 July 2021diff hist 0‎ Arcology‎ If the words 'another significant example' are used, the example should not come first - rearranged order

01:5901:59, 18 July 2021diff hist +161‎ Talk:Arcology‎ new info under old, right?
01:5701:57, 18 July 2021diff hist +3,346‎ Talk:Arcology‎No edit summary
00:5500:55, 18 July 2021diff hist +1,675‎ User talk:Doniago‎ despite requests for discussion, discussion is deleted - editor has been grossly discourteous and is becoming abusiveTag: Reverted

22:1522:15, 17 July 2021diff hist +1,216‎ User talk:Doniago‎No edit summaryTag: Reverted
21:1221:12, 17 July 2021diff hist +273‎ Arcology‎ The only possible citation is to the novel itself, which is already identifiable by its name and author, and there is already a link to another Wikipedia page specific to that novel. Why don't you put a [citation needed] tag on the content, so that someone who feels the need to provide it can do so, rather than delete the content? This behavior is a large part of why people avoid adding to Wikipedia.Tags: Undo Reverted

09:0209:02, 16 July 2021diff hist +273‎ Arcology‎ Wikipedia already acknowledges the novel as noteworthy. If you want a citation, write one yourself.Tags: Undo Reverted
09:0009:00, 16 July 2021diff hist −980‎ User talk:38.87.50.131‎ The content already contains a link to Wikipedia's article on the novel. If you want a citation, write one yourself.Tag: Undo

04:4304:43, 15 July 2021diff hist −7‎ Hellstrom's Hive‎ 'though' is superfluous
04:3804:38, 15 July 2021diff hist +273‎ Arcology‎ Undid revision 1033591493 - It's the basic premise of the book, so basic no other sources feel the need to reiterate it, and merely listing the publication details conveys no new informationTags: Undo Reverted