User contributions for 71.163.32.84

30 October 2013

• 04:0104:01, 30 October 2013diff hist +798‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Higher Dimensions

29 October 2013

• 14:1014:10, 29 October 2013diff hist +278‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Higher Dimensions
• 02:5702:57, 29 October 2013diff hist +19‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Higher Dimensions
• 02:5602:56, 29 October 2013diff hist +583‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Higher Dimensions

28 October 2013

• 14:1914:19, 28 October 2013diff hist +335‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Higher Dimensions
• 06:0206:02, 28 October 2013diff hist +1,268‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Higher Dimensions
• 03:1003:10, 28 October 2013diff hist −10‎ Chain rule‎ →‎Higher derivatives of multivariable functions: More notational errors. This would be made clearer by giving the functions arguments throughout the formula, but what was stated was clearly wrong.
• 03:0803:08, 28 October 2013diff hist −43‎ Chain rule‎ →‎Higher derivatives: Fixed errors.
• 03:0503:05, 28 October 2013diff hist +420‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Higher Dimensions: new section

27 October 2013

• 15:4415:44, 27 October 2013diff hist −3‎ Convolution‎ →‎Differentiation: Fixed error.

26 October 2013

• 22:1322:13, 26 October 2013diff hist 0‎ Function composition‎ Fixed typo.
• 22:0222:02, 26 October 2013diff hist +8‎ Function composition‎ Seemed like better wording, again.
• 21:5821:58, 26 October 2013diff hist −45‎ Function composition‎ What was written seemed overly-wordy and confusing; I think this is cleaner.
• 14:4014:40, 26 October 2013diff hist +4‎ Chain rule‎ Added a couple of articles.
• 14:3314:33, 26 October 2013diff hist +161‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 04:5304:53, 26 October 2013diff hist +68‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 04:4504:45, 26 October 2013diff hist +1,018‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 04:3504:35, 26 October 2013diff hist +1,227‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 02:5002:50, 26 October 2013diff hist +281‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 02:3702:37, 26 October 2013diff hist +715‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 01:3201:32, 26 October 2013diff hist +26‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 01:3001:30, 26 October 2013diff hist +178‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 01:2801:28, 26 October 2013diff hist +899‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor

25 October 2013

• 22:4822:48, 25 October 2013diff hist +932‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 22:0322:03, 25 October 2013diff hist +99‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 22:0122:01, 25 October 2013diff hist +21‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 22:0022:00, 25 October 2013diff hist +591‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 21:4421:44, 25 October 2013diff hist +2‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 21:4221:42, 25 October 2013diff hist +44‎ Talk:Chain rule‎No edit summary
• 21:4221:42, 25 October 2013diff hist +237‎ Talk:Chain rule‎No edit summary
• 21:3421:34, 25 October 2013diff hist −12‎ Talk:Chain rule‎No edit summary
• 21:3421:34, 25 October 2013diff hist +798‎ Talk:Chain rule‎No edit summary
• 21:2321:23, 25 October 2013diff hist +187‎ Talk:Chain rule‎ →‎Notational consistency/rigor
• 02:4702:47, 25 October 2013diff hist −3‎ Chain rule‎ Undid revision 578638781 by Ozob (talk) Yes, it is; what you just wrote is an abuse of notation, and to make it correct you must formally define it to mean what you replaced.
• 02:2102:21, 25 October 2013diff hist +1‎ Chain rule‎ Added parens.
• 02:1802:18, 25 October 2013diff hist +15‎ Chain rule‎ Previous notation was not, indeed, the chain rule for f composed of g.

3 October 2013

• 03:2103:21, 3 October 2013diff hist 0‎ Tramadol‎ scratch that last edit. Non-synthetic, but wasn't actually found in opium.
• 03:1403:14, 3 October 2013diff hist −10‎ Tramadol‎ Has been found to be a natural product, this is not an opioid.