20 May 2024
- 18:4918:49, 20 May 2024diff hist +2 Chibcha language →Vowels
- 10:4710:47, 20 May 2024diff hist +16 Chibcha languageNo edit summary
- 08:2108:21, 20 May 2024diff hist +207 Chibcha language →Lugo Grammar: These sources are legitimate documents and the only source of the language. The only true spelling is that of these fonts.
- 08:1508:15, 20 May 2024diff hist +888 Chibcha language →Language sources
- 08:0908:09, 20 May 2024diff hist +515 Chibcha language →Language sources
- 08:0508:05, 20 May 2024diff hist +2 Chibcha language →Language sources
- 08:0408:04, 20 May 2024diff hist +318 Chibcha language →Language sources
- 08:0308:03, 20 May 2024diff hist +618 Chibcha language →Language sources
- 08:0008:00, 20 May 2024diff hist +720 Chibcha language →Language sources
- 07:5707:57, 20 May 2024diff hist +2 Chibcha languageNo edit summary
- 07:5607:56, 20 May 2024diff hist +713 Chibcha language →Language sources
- 07:5407:54, 20 May 2024diff hist +210 Chibcha languageNo edit summary
- 07:5307:53, 20 May 2024diff hist +4,710 Chibcha language This information is based on primary sources of the language and on information given by several cited scholars. Any other spelling is not legitimate. Stop promoting a version that does not correspond to reality.Tag: Manual revert
19 May 2024
- 19:5419:54, 19 May 2024diff hist +81 Chibcha language →Adjective
- 19:5219:52, 19 May 2024diff hist −1 Chibcha language →Adjective
- 19:5119:51, 19 May 2024diff hist +151 Chibcha language →Adjective
- 19:5119:51, 19 May 2024diff hist +154 Chibcha language →Nouns
- 19:4419:44, 19 May 2024diff hist +4,741 Chibcha language Saravia is not reliable and his phonological proposal of Chibcha and even more so his orthography is not the only one nor the most widespread. His work is not considered serious by any Colombian linguist.Tag: Manual revert
- 08:5908:59, 19 May 2024diff hist +12 Chibcha language →Grammar
- 08:5608:56, 19 May 2024diff hist +8 Chibcha language →Nouns
- 08:5008:50, 19 May 2024diff hist −4 Chibcha language →Nouns
- 08:4808:48, 19 May 2024diff hist −168 Chibcha language →GrammarTag: section blanking
- 08:4608:46, 19 May 2024diff hist −5 Chibcha language →Nouns
- 08:4508:45, 19 May 2024diff hist +638 Chibcha language →Grammar
- 08:2208:22, 19 May 2024diff hist +7 Chibcha language →Grammar
- 08:2008:20, 19 May 2024diff hist +464 Chibcha language →Grammar
- 07:2007:20, 19 May 2024diff hist +4,769 Chibcha language It is you Fdom5997 who is altering the information, leaving aside sources accredited by institutions such as the University of Pennsylvania, Cambriage University and Instituto Caro y Cuervo. Saravia is not a reliable source, their works are mere PDFs published on a website without review by academic peers, by a foundation with a clear political intention.Tag: Manual revert
18 May 2024
- 18:5818:58, 18 May 2024diff hist +115 Chibcha language →Proposal by Adolfo ConstenlaTag: Reverted
- 18:5118:51, 18 May 2024diff hist +4,630 Chibcha language Constenla, Adelaar & Muysken & González are reputable sources. Stop promoting the phonology you like or invented and hiding the fact that there is no academic consensus.Tags: Manual revert Reverted
17 May 2024
- 09:4709:47, 17 May 2024diff hist +105 Talk:Chibcha language →Political narrative and historical erasure
- 09:4709:47, 17 May 2024diff hist +613 Talk:Chibcha languageNo edit summary
- 09:2609:26, 17 May 2024diff hist +1,363 Chibcha language →Proposal by Adelaar & MuyskenTags: Reverted harv-error references removed
- 08:4208:42, 17 May 2024diff hist +3,250 Chibcha language Undid revision 1224237919 by Fdom5997 (talk) Answer: Constenla, González and Adelaar with Muysken, are authors who have published their proposals in accredited publications and serious institutions, University of Pennsylvania, Cambriage University and Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Tags: Undo Reverted
- 08:3908:39, 17 May 2024diff hist −1,239 Chibcha language Undid revision 1224237807 by Fdom5997 (talk) No. These are not the best proposals. The best proposals are those of Constenla and Adelaar with Muysken.Tags: Undo Reverted
16 May 2024
- 18:5118:51, 16 May 2024diff hist +1 Chibcha language →Phonology
- 18:4918:49, 16 May 2024diff hist +27 Chibcha language →Phonology
- 18:4718:47, 16 May 2024diff hist +3,244 Chibcha language It is important to note that different phonologies have been proposed over time.
- 09:5309:53, 16 May 2024diff hist −2 Chibcha language Undid revision 1224068316 by Zaquezipe (talk) Answer: The constructed languages are mostly based on pre-existing grammar and vocabulary, such as ApI Interlingua, which is absolutely based on classical Latin.Tag: Undo
15 May 2024
- 21:0121:01, 15 May 2024diff hist +5 Chibcha language Undid revision 1224021626 by Zaquezipe (talk) Answer: There is a huge difference between "reviving a language" and "revitalizing a language." Revival occurs in cases where there are no native speakers, while revitalization occurs when a dying language is encouraged and promoted so that it does not die. In the case of chibcha all attempts at revival are constructions from the present.Tag: Undo
- 19:4919:49, 15 May 2024diff hist +341 Chibcha languageNo edit summary
- 19:4119:41, 15 May 2024diff hist +22 Chibcha languageNo edit summary
- 19:3919:39, 15 May 2024diff hist +593 Chibcha languageNo edit summary
- 10:0010:00, 15 May 2024diff hist +54 Chibcha languageNo edit summaryTag: Reverted
14 May 2024
- 12:1112:11, 14 May 2024diff hist −43 Chibcha language Undid revision 1223789223 by Zaquezipe (talk) Answer: What is the basis for the claim that the revitalization initiatives are very close to the original? The question is clear. Are there native speakers or not? Do not delete reasoned information and quotes.Tag: Undo
- 09:2809:28, 14 May 2024diff hist +252 Talk:Chibcha language →Myska language
- 06:2006:20, 14 May 2024diff hist −43 Chibcha language Undid revision 1223721512 by Zaquezipe (talk) Answer: Any attempt at revitalization cannot be compared with any native speakers, but only with incomplete documents produced by non-native speakers. It is a fallacy to say that it is the same language.Tag: Undo
13 May 2024
- 21:0221:02, 13 May 2024diff hist −25 Chibcha language Undid revision 1223704573 by Zaquezipe (talk) Review what a native speaker is. The table asks if there are native speakers, and Chibcha has no native speakers.Tag: Undo
- 20:3020:30, 13 May 2024diff hist +4 Chibcha languageNo edit summary
- 20:2820:28, 13 May 2024diff hist +145 Chibcha languageNo edit summary
- 20:1620:16, 13 May 2024diff hist +67 Chibcha language According to Glotolog, the complete reference database of the world's languages is an extinct language.Tag: Undo
🔥 Top keywords: Main PageSpecial:SearchWikipedia:Featured picturesYasukeHarrison ButkerRobert FicoBridgertonCleopatraDeaths in 2024Joyce VincentXXXTentacionHank AdamsIt Ends with UsYouTubeNew Caledonia2024 Indian general electionHeeramandiDarren DutchyshenSlovakiaKingdom of the Planet of the ApesAttempted assassination of Robert FicoLawrence WongBaby ReindeerXXX: Return of Xander CageThelma HoustonFuriosa: A Mad Max SagaMegalopolis (film)Richard GaddKepler's SupernovaWicked (musical)Sunil ChhetriXXX (2002 film)Ashley MadisonAnya Taylor-JoyPlanet of the ApesNava MauYoung SheldonPortal:Current eventsX-Men '97