User contributions for 97.119.99.113

30 July 2021

• 20:2420:24, 30 July 2021diff hist +266‎ Talk:Lou Dobbs‎No edit summary

16 July 2021

• 23:1123:11, 16 July 2021diff hist +548‎ Talk:Lou Dobbs‎No edit summary
• 22:3722:37, 16 July 2021diff hist −4‎ Talk:Lou Dobbs‎No edit summary
• 22:2622:26, 16 July 2021diff hist +44‎ Talk:Lou Dobbs‎No edit summary
• 22:2422:24, 16 July 2021diff hist +620‎ Talk:Lou Dobbs‎No edit summary
• 21:2421:24, 16 July 2021diff hist +1‎ Talk:Lou Dobbs‎No edit summary
• 21:2321:23, 16 July 2021diff hist +682‎ Talk:Lou Dobbs‎No edit summary
• 13:4013:40, 16 July 2021diff hist +1,140‎ Talk:Lou Dobbs‎ Cite sources on that voting machines were thought to be insecure before 2020.

15 July 2021

• 23:5623:56, 15 July 2021diff hist +17‎ Talk:Lou Dobbs‎No edit summary
• 23:4323:43, 15 July 2021diff hist +141‎ Talk:Lou Dobbs‎ →‎POV phrases: new section
• 23:4123:41, 15 July 2021diff hist +8‎ Lou Dobbs‎ Partisan vandals continue to remove my attempts to make article neutral. I'm flagging it with NPoV, reverts to this change are in violation of wikipedia NPoV dispute resolution policy.Tag: Reverted
• 23:3423:34, 15 July 2021diff hist −17‎ Lou Dobbs‎ Since you refuse to provide a citation the dispute remains unresolved. Please stop polluting this platform with your presence. Undid revision 1033804062 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk)Tags: Undo Reverted
• 23:3123:31, 15 July 2021diff hist −17‎ Lou Dobbs‎ In support of my change, I quote the following from Wikiped:NPOV disputes: "In a neutral representation, the differing points of view are presented as differing points of view, not as widely accepted facts." Undid revision 1033803338 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk)Tags: Undo Reverted
• 23:2423:24, 15 July 2021diff hist −17‎ Lou Dobbs‎ A third person with a history of partisan vandalism of this page has reverted my change. Need to provide citation for disputed claim. Undid revision 1033802024 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk)Tags: Undo Reverted
• 19:5719:57, 15 July 2021diff hist −17‎ Lou Dobbs‎ Please provide a citation, rather than attempting to censor changes towards NPoV. Otherwise you are turning this platform into mere partisan propaganda. Undid revision 1033762718 by Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk)Tags: Undo Reverted
• 15:5015:50, 15 July 2021diff hist −17‎ Lou Dobbs‎ If documented a source would be cited, but even if so you are clearly more interested in propagandizing rather than reaching NPOV. Undid revision 1033744712 by Soibangla (talk)Tags: Undo Reverted
• 15:2215:22, 15 July 2021diff hist −17‎ Lou Dobbs‎ Editorial declaration phrases such as "false conspiracy theoires" on controversial subjects amount to NPOV violation.Tag: Reverted