User contributions for BlueonGray

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

15:3415:34, 18 May 2014diff hist −97‎ mBelly dance‎ There is no evidence that belly dancing originated in the Middle East.

00:5900:59, 17 February 2014diff hist −18‎ Charles Taylor (philosopher)‎ →‎Communitarian critique of liberalism: Deleted the inclusion of Gad Barsilai. Just lacking in significance compared to MacIntyre, Walzer, and Sandel.

19:3619:36, 16 December 2013diff hist −162‎ mPragmatism‎ →‎Pragmatists in the extended sense: Another very arbitrary and unjustified inclusion in this list. He can't convincingly be described as a pragmatist, whether in an extended sense or some other sense.
19:3419:34, 16 December 2013diff hist −97‎ mPragmatism‎ →‎Pragmatists in the extended sense: This individual doesn't belong here. He may be a pragmatist and a notable communication scholar, but he isn't a notable pragmatist.

16:0416:04, 17 June 2013diff hist −10‎ mLaura Mersini-Houghton‎ →‎Education: Permanent tenure? As opposed to what, temporary tenure? This article smacks of promotion to me.
16:0316:03, 17 June 2013diff hist −1‎ mLaura Mersini-Houghton‎ Poor punctuation.

21:1321:13, 15 June 2013diff hist −54‎ mTodd May‎ The idea that Todd May "is also very fly" obviously doesn't belong here.

16:4616:46, 10 June 2013diff hist −270‎ mUniversity of Winnipeg‎ Misleading: UW is **not** a research university. Therefore, including its ranking among "top research universities" misleading, especially in the introduction.

06:1806:18, 4 May 2013diff hist −1,176‎ mThe China Study‎ →‎Reception: The criticism by Hu and Willett isn't about this book. It doesn't belong here.

17:4117:41, 3 May 2013diff hist −326‎ mAmerican Institute for Cancer Research‎ Charity Watch is an ideological website, not a neutral and impartial source of information.

06:3406:34, 30 April 2013diff hist −155‎ mSoy milk‎ →‎Health and nutrition: No logical flow from one sentence to the next. Also, the second sentence referenced a partisan blog, not a neutral source.

18:0318:03, 21 April 2013diff hist −343‎ Saturated fat‎ →‎Cardiovascular disease: Commentary doesn't match the explicit conclusion.
17:4617:46, 21 April 2013diff hist −2,160‎ mThe China Study‎ →‎Reception: Criticism of the book should cite notable sources, not amateurish blogs by flagrantly partisan hacks. Also, citing studies that merely reach different conclusions has nothing to do with the RECEPTION of the book.
00:0200:02, 21 April 2013diff hist −1,277‎ The China Study‎ →‎Reception: The blogger isn't a credible authority on nutrition.

01:1901:19, 12 April 2013diff hist −523‎ mTrimethylamine N-oxide‎ →‎Health issues: Non-objective assessment that appeals to the authority of a non-objective scientist who works for a non-objective, pro-meat advocacy organization. Has no place in an encyclopedia entry.

00:2200:22, 30 March 2013diff hist −189‎ mLipid hypothesis‎ Amateurish website that does not deserve to be cited as an authoritative reference or example of serious opposition to the lipid hypothesis.
00:2000:20, 30 March 2013diff hist +73‎ mLipid hypothesis‎ Clarifying the nature of the opposition to the lipid hypothesis.

04:3104:31, 29 March 2013diff hist −742‎ Ancel Keys‎ →‎Criticism: These are partisan criticisms that reference promotional websites and a YouTube video, not peer-reviewed studies. They have no place in an encyclopedia entry.