User contributions for Dr.gregory.retzlaff

18 June 2024

• 03:5303:53, 18 June 2024diff hist +7‎ mRCAF Station Estevan‎ Methinks Fargo is in North Dakota . . . .current

20 April 2024

• 18:0918:09, 20 April 2024diff hist −222‎ Popcorn‎ US consumption about a million pounds per year (later in article), a couple of 10 thousands more is not aamatic increase.

28 January 2024

• 07:0807:08, 28 January 2024diff hist 0‎ Ingenuity (helicopter)‎ I think this is what is meant.

10 January 2024

• 05:1305:13, 10 January 2024diff hist −37‎ Sabatier reaction‎ Nm^3 does not exist; N is not an SI prefix, and the reference does not quote 6 m^3 or anything like it.

25 December 2023

• 13:3713:37, 25 December 2023diff hist +497‎ Talk:The Partridge Family‎ →‎Laurie Partridge father gets drunk??: new sectionTag: New topic
• 13:3113:31, 25 December 2023diff hist −73‎ The Partridge Family‎ Removed sentence that makes no sense and has no reference. See talk page

19 December 2023

• 06:5406:54, 19 December 2023diff hist −40‎ User talk:Dr.gregory.retzlaff‎No edit summarycurrent
• 06:3706:37, 19 December 2023diff hist +660‎ User talk:Dr.gregory.retzlaff‎ →‎December 2023: ReplyTag: Reply
• 06:2206:22, 19 December 2023diff hist +812‎ SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2‎No edit summary
• 06:1306:13, 19 December 2023diff hist −254‎ SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2‎ I submit this as a compromise.
• 05:5905:59, 19 December 2023diff hist +517‎ Talk:SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2‎No edit summary
• 05:3905:39, 19 December 2023diff hist +692‎ SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2‎ Undid revision 1190662605 by Foonix0 (talk) The overkill was spacex gaslighting the world by saying it was a success when it was not. The flight did NOT fulfill it's objectives --> not a success. It says in THIS VERY ARTICLE that the objectives were not fulfulled.Tag: Undo

18 December 2023

• 15:4415:44, 18 December 2023diff hist +356‎ Talk:SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2‎ →‎Mission success: ReplyTag: Reply
• 15:3615:36, 18 December 2023diff hist +622‎ Talk:SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2‎ →‎Mission success: ReplyTag: Reply

17 December 2023

• 23:5523:55, 17 December 2023diff hist +49‎ SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2‎ The flight objectives are given in this Wikipedia article - first paragraph and enumerated below the first photo. Below the first photo it says explicitly the ones that were not met. This is a fact reported in this article.Tag: Reverted
• 19:5419:54, 17 December 2023diff hist +496‎ Talk:SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2‎ →‎Mission success: new sectionTag: New topic
• 19:5219:52, 17 December 2023diff hist +35‎ SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2‎ Undid revision 1190410763 by Redacted II (talk) See talk pageTags: Undo Reverted

16 December 2023

• 16:0616:06, 16 December 2023diff hist 0‎ SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2‎No edit summaryTag: Reverted
• 16:0516:05, 16 December 2023diff hist +121‎ SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2‎ It was not ultimately successful, though a good successful test. Successful flight means the flight objectives were met - they were not in this case.Tag: Reverted
• 15:1915:19, 16 December 2023diff hist −92‎ Sophie Anderson (actress)‎ No reference at all, and not very probable either.
• 15:1715:17, 16 December 2023diff hist +492‎ Talk:Sophie Anderson (actress)‎ →‎30 men per day: new sectionTag: New topic
• 15:1415:14, 16 December 2023diff hist −529‎ Sophie Anderson (actress)‎ This unreliable reference is an offhand remark from her to a newspaper reporter. The numbers mean she slept with more than 30 men per day, highly improbable.

12 December 2023

• 06:0006:00, 12 December 2023diff hist +6‎ Plutonium hexafluoride‎ Small change but much more accurate now.

10 December 2023

• 06:2906:29, 10 December 2023diff hist −563‎ Sophie Anderson (actress)‎ The reference is an offhand remark to a newspaper reporter. The numbers mean she slept with more than 10 men per day, 365 days in each year since she turned 16. I think not.

8 December 2023

• 05:4505:45, 8 December 2023diff hist −6‎ Explorer S-46 (satellite)‎ More accurate description
• 00:2000:20, 8 December 2023diff hist +5‎ Friday the 13th‎ About 1 part in 700.

6 December 2023

• 03:1303:13, 6 December 2023diff hist +573‎ Talk:Earnest Andersson‎ →‎Stravinsky's work: ReplyTag: Reply
• 02:5202:52, 6 December 2023diff hist +388‎ Talk:Earnest Andersson‎ →‎Stravinsky's work: ReplyTag: Reply
• 02:4802:48, 6 December 2023diff hist +770‎ Talk:Earnest Andersson‎ →‎Stravinsky's work: ReplyTag: Reply
• 02:2602:26, 6 December 2023diff hist +554‎ Talk:Earnest Andersson‎ →‎Stravinsky's work: ReplyTag: Reply
• 02:2002:20, 6 December 2023diff hist +233‎ Talk:Earnest Andersson‎No edit summary
• 02:1102:11, 6 December 2023diff hist +306‎ Talk:Earnest Andersson‎ →‎Stravinsky's work: new sectionTag: New topic
• 02:0802:08, 6 December 2023diff hist +261‎ User talk:Dr.gregory.retzlaff‎ →‎December 2023: ReplyTag: Reply
• 02:0602:06, 6 December 2023diff hist −41‎ Earnest Andersson‎No edit summaryTag: Reverted
• 02:0402:04, 6 December 2023diff hist −42‎ Earnest Andersson‎ Ditto.Tag: Reverted
• 01:5301:53, 6 December 2023diff hist −42‎ Earnest Andersson‎ Listing all this is out of place here, an attempt to establish gravitas for the very shaky claims of his impact as a composer.Tag: Reverted
• 01:2701:27, 6 December 2023diff hist −64‎ Earnest Andersson‎ No references to either of these; there are millions of self taught artists in history. Any reference to the work of author Slim is very poor at best, there are no collaborating references to virtually all his claims.Tag: Reverted
• 00:5200:52, 6 December 2023diff hist −66‎ Vanguard TV-3BU‎ A bit more concise and accurate.

2 December 2023

• 22:0422:04, 2 December 2023diff hist −248‎ Radon‎ This is unclearly written, wrong and not referenced.

30 November 2023

• 20:4220:42, 30 November 2023diff hist −88‎ Jack Parsons‎ Undid revision 1187372580 by MagicatthemovieS (talk) a few latent homosexual thoughts and no actions or relationships does not qualify him.Tag: Undo

29 November 2023

• 23:5023:50, 29 November 2023diff hist −41‎ Evelyn Nesbit‎ Removed a very odd, unreferenced statement. "used intermediaries to disarm Nesbit"?? Physically, emotionally? A drugging and rape has been suggested. Unclear statement, not referenced.

28 November 2023

• 08:2108:21, 28 November 2023diff hist +4‎ Boeing Boeing (1965 film)‎No edit summary

26 November 2023

• 05:0005:00, 26 November 2023diff hist −13‎ mSergei Korolev‎ tidy up slightly
• 04:5104:51, 26 November 2023diff hist +1‎ mSergei Korolev‎ Typo or transliteration problem.
• 04:4304:43, 26 November 2023diff hist +1‎ Sergei Korolev‎ slightly more concise.
• 04:3604:36, 26 November 2023diff hist −253‎ Sergei Korolev‎ He was not the father. The other Russian Tsiolkovsky was the father of astronautics; Korolev and von Braun (and likely Oberth) were the godparents/uncles/midwives as you wish.
• 04:2904:29, 26 November 2023diff hist −3‎ Sergei Korolev‎ They were pretty much equal.
• 04:1704:17, 26 November 2023diff hist −44‎ Sergei Korolev‎ "altitude would not be survivable" makes no sense. The problem was parachuting 3 crew out of the capsule, also little space for parachutes in the capsule.
• 04:1304:13, 26 November 2023diff hist +4‎ Sergei Korolev‎ Voskhod 1 predated the first manned Gemini 3.
• 03:4203:42, 26 November 2023diff hist +2‎ Sergei Korolev‎ Same as last edit