User contributions for Sci fli889

28 September 2018

• 01:1501:15, 28 September 2018diff hist −330‎ mV. S. Ramachandran‎ Attempting to include one persons opinion about a specific study as general reception about Ramachandran is inaccurate, and comments about specific works don't belong in this sectionTag: references removed

27 September 2018

• 23:0023:00, 27 September 2018diff hist −6‎ mV. S. Ramachandran‎ Restored balanced statement about reception within scientific community. This is generalizable unlike statements about specific works.
• 22:5822:58, 27 September 2018diff hist −315‎ mV. S. Ramachandran‎ Attempting to include one persons opinion about a specific study as general reception about Ramachandran is inaccurate.Tag: references removed

19 September 2018

• 23:0423:04, 19 September 2018diff hist +4‎ mV. S. Ramachandran‎ word inclusion for recent edit.Tag: Visual edit
• 23:0223:02, 19 September 2018diff hist +701‎ mV. S. Ramachandran‎ The beginning section of Ramachandran's wikipedia seemed to only include thoughts about public reception of his work - so I've provided an inclusion of how his work is received by someone with high standing in the scientific community as well. Along with this change, I've included information about his service to scientific journals. This is what seems to have been done for other scientists (see, for example, the same section for Steven Pinker).Tag: Visual edit