TX Ursae Majoris

TX Ursae Majoris is an eclipsing binary star system in the northern circumpolar constellation of Ursa Major. With a combined apparent visual magnitude of 6.97,[3] the system is too faint to be readily viewed with the naked eye. The pair orbit each other with a period of 3.063 days in a circular orbit,[7] with their orbital plane aligned close to the line of sight from the Earth. During the primary eclipse, the net brightness decreases by 1.74 magnitudes, while the secondary eclipse results in a drop of just 0.07 magnitude.[5] TX UMa is located at a distance of approximately 780 light years from the Sun based on parallax measurements,[2] but is drifting closer with a mean radial velocity of −13 km/s.[6]

TX Ursae Majoris

A light curve for TX Ursae Majoris, plotted from TESS data[1]
Observation data
Epoch J2000.0      Equinox J2000.0
ConstellationUrsa Major
Right ascension10h 45m 20.504s[2]
Declination+45° 33′ 58.71″[2]
Apparent magnitude (V)6.97[3]
Characteristics
Spectral typeB8V + G0III-IV[4]
B−V color index−0.003±0.026[3]
Variable typeβ Per[5]
Astrometry
Radial velocity (Rv)−13.2±0.9[6] km/s
Proper motion (μ) RA: 9.595 mas/yr[2]
Dec.: 4.412 mas/yr[2]
Parallax (π)4.1849 ± 0.0841 mas[2]
Distance780 ± 20 ly
(239 ± 5 pc)
Absolute magnitude (MV)0.60[3]
Orbit[7] (1990)
Period (P)3.063 d
Semi-major axis (a)≥ 3.315 R
Eccentricity (e)0.0134
Argument of periastron (ω)
(secondary)
324.7°
Semi-amplitude (K1)
(primary)
54.8 km/s
Details
TX UMa A
Mass4.76±0.16[8] M
Radius2.83[8] R
Luminosity182+18
−16
[9] L
Surface gravity (log g)4.2±0.15[8] cgs
Temperature12,900±300[8] K
Rotational velocity (v sin i)69±3[8] km/s
TX UMa B
Mass1.18±0.06[8] M
Radius4.24[8] R
Luminosity13.5+6.0
−4.2
[9] L
Surface gravity (log g)3.3±0.3[8] cgs
Temperature5,500±500[8] K
Rotational velocity (v sin i)72±5[8] km/s
Other designations
TX Uma, BD+46 1659, GC 14783, HD 93033, HIP 52599, SAO 43460, PPM 52052[10]
Database references
SIMBADdata

In 1931, H. Rügemer and H. Schneller independently discovered this is an eclipsing binary system of the Algol type.[11] Rügemer later found that the eclipse period was not constant,[12] a behavior that was subsequently explained as apsidal precession.[13] B. Cester and associates in 1977 confirmed this is a semidetached binary system consisting of a main sequence primary star and an evolved giant companion.[14] A study of the system by J. M. Kreiner and J. Tremko in 1980 disproved that changes in the eclipse period are due to apsidal motion.[12]

The light curve of this system shows little impact from proximity effects between the two stars, making it only weakly interacting. The primary eclipse is very deep with less than 5% of the brighter star's light appearing at central eclipse,[15] allowing the spectrum of the fainter secondary to be directly examined.[16] In addition to a steady decrease in the system orbital period, multiple irregular changes in the period were observed between 1903 and 1996.[17] The slowing orbit may be due in part from magnetic breaking of the mass-donor secondary, causing a transfer of angular momentum to the system. An accretion disk may be a contributing factor.[18] Spectral evidence supports an accretion disk in orbit around the primary that is sustained by mass transfer.[19] A faint emission from the system is evidence of a circumbinary ionized shell.[20]

The cooler secondary component is the more evolved member of the pair with a stellar classification of G0III-I,[4] having previously exhausted the supply of hydrogen at its core and evolved off the main sequence. This star has filled its Roche lobe and is contributing mass to the primary.[8] It now has 1.2 times the Sun's mass but has expanded to 4.2 times the solar radius.[8] The secondary is rotating synchronously with its orbit.[8] The primary component of this system is a B-type main-sequence star with a stellar classification of B8V.[4] It is rotating 1.5[8] times as fast as the orbital rate due to the impact of mass accretion from the secondary.[4] The primary has 4.8 times the mass and 2.8 times the radius of the Sun.[8]

References

Further reading

  • Screech, James (June 2020), "Algol type eclipsing binary TX UMa. Can all sources have the correct period?", British Astronomical Association Variable Star Section Circular, 184 (184): 36–37, Bibcode:2020BAAVC.184...36S.
  • Maxted, P. F. L.; et al. (September 1995), "Studies of early-type variable stars. XIII. Spectroscopic orbit and absolute parameters of TX Ursae Majoris", Astronomy and Astrophysics, 301: 135, Bibcode:1995A&A...301..135M.
  • Kang, Young W.; Oh, Kyu D. (March 1993), "Simultaneous Solutions for Photometric and Spectroscopic Observations of Tx-Ursae", Astrophysics and Space Science, 201 (2): 177–189, Bibcode:1993Ap&SS.201..177K, doi:10.1007/BF00627192, S2CID 122888042.
  • Hric, L.; Komzik, R. (March 1992), "The Eclipsing Binary TX UMa - a Period Change again", Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 3698 (1): 1, Bibcode:1992IBVS.3698....1H.
  • Oh, Kyu-Dong (June 1986), "Photometric Orbit of TX UMa", Journal of Astronomy and Space Science, 3 (1): 41–51, Bibcode:1986JASS....3...41O.
  • Koch, R. H. (June 1961), "Departures from the Russell model in TX Ursae Majoris", Astronomical Journal, 66: 230–242, Bibcode:1961AJ.....66..230K, doi:10.1086/108401.
  • Pearce, J. A. (November 1932), "The Spectroscopic Elements of the Eclipsing Variable TX Ursae Majoris", Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 26: 382, Bibcode:1932JRASC..26..382P.