Talk:2001 Major League Baseball contraction plan

Latest comment: 1 month ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
WikiProject iconBaseball: Twins Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Minnesota Twins.
WikiProject iconMinnesota
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCanada: Quebec / Montreal / Sport Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 05:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Created by Songwaters (talk). Self-nominated at 15:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC).

  • Date and length fine. I would prefer the original because it has the broadest reach by mentioning both teams. However @Songwaters: there are a large number of citation needed tags which would have to be removed/sourced before this can proceed. A QPQ is not needed as this is their first nomination. No close paraphrasing. Just needs those tags sorted then ping me and I'll have another look. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this. You have a good hook angle here, but the sources do not name these teams at all, only saying they were "likely" to be the teams that would be cut. Your article also uses this nuanced wording. Please tweak the hook. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Songwaters: thanks for the alt. But it really doesn't have broad audience interest; we are constantly getting comments from other editors that they aren't even familiar with the mechanics of baseball. Only a real fan would know how many teams there are in the league and what it would mean to lose a few. Can you pull something out of the article that would have broader interest? Yoninah (talk) 16:33, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Yes, ALT5 is good, thanks. Hook ref verified and cited inline. Rest of review per The C of E. ALT5 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 19:53, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Major League Baseball which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)