Talk:2010 Kaohsiung earthquake

Earthquakes Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge?

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Since this is minor, why not merging it into 2010 earthquakes? --DAI (Δ) 10:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Agree. 71.107.193.35 (talk) 20:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Dissagree, earthquakes are events notable enough to have there own articles, if there reletivly large. This one is.--HighFlyingFish (talk) 18:19, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Disagree too. 6.7, 96 injuries, located close to a large population centre, loss of power, structural damage, trains disrupted, a fire. Seems as large as you can get without anyone dying. --candle•wicke 10:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Earthquake scale

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The infobox has it as 6.4 on moment magnitude scale, but body has it as 6.4 on Richter magnitude scale. Which is it? dude1818 (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Kaohsiung earthquakes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100307230854/http://news.chinatimes.com/2007Cti/2007Cti-News/2007Cti-News-Content/0,4521,50104574+132010030401802,00.html to http://news.chinatimes.com/2007Cti/2007Cti-News/2007Cti-News-Content/0,4521,50104574

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Add topic