This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Articles Akshardham temple Siege and Akshardham temple atack sems to describe the same incident. I believe they should be merged into just one. I suggest to copy info form Siege into Atack, and make it a Redirect. --Abu Badali 16:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Merge, per nomination. --Abu Badali 16:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
I did it. I'd appreciate a fact check, since the siege page listed "2 terrorists" and the attack page "3 gunmen." I stuck with 3 for now. Brighterorange 18:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
It is actually two. I will fix it Juthani1tcs 20:28, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Suggested Edits
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
At present, the article provides a limited and cursory overview of the Akshardham Temple attack. The article itself contains a few citations and does not offer a chronological timeline of events. Therefore, I propose an overhaul of this article which takes into account the aforementioned limitations. Pshamb (talk) 03:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
It would be helpful if some editor would like to take on checking names throughout the article. I have spent so much time just on common proofreading issues, plus formatting and consistency, that I don't want to go back over the article any further; but I've noticed that at times, only a surname was given, or initials were used without knowing for sure whether the person referred to prefers to omit them or not. Then too, the article often gives both a first and last name after a person is referred to the first time, which should not be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Augnablik (talk • contribs) 08:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
