This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I just marked two sections with templates to indicated that they have no sources. It may be that they need to be removed if no sources can be found. The introductory text also has no citations. I can't really delete that without messing up the whole article. I will just put a "Expert Needed" template at the top. I will also try to find a wiki-project it can be listed under.
Latest comment: 1 month ago4 comments3 people in discussion
I placed this banner because sections of critical importance to this article are un-cited. The information contained in the un-cited sections needs to be verified and cited. The only other option that I can see is nominating this article for deletion.
Totally agree, this article has no real references. All the provided references are dead links. FYI @SaqibCrosji (talk) 03:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
While the subject does not meet WP:POLITICIAN, but he received considerable press coverage following his death such as this, this and this. I still need to check further but he seems to borderline meets the WP:GNG. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 09:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Sure, makes sense. Thank you. Crosji (talk) 16:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Neutrality
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I think this article needs to be expanded on and cleaned up a bit. It is a bit biased. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chipface (talk • contribs) 17:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)