Talk:Altes Stadthaus, Bonn

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Thine Antique Pen in topic GA Review
Good articleAltes Stadthaus, Bonn has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 6, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 26, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Altes Stadthaus in Bonn was built for French occupation forces after World War I?
WikiProject iconArchitecture Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLibraries Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Altes Stadthaus, Bonn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 08:26, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Nice article. Here are a few issues:

  • "It was mainly housed in the now-demolished section of the building.[8]" - it is?
  • I mean, "It" is what?--Kürbis () 18:01, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Why is SPD and Cologne not linked?
  • SPD is linked in the second paragraph in the History section.  Done Cologne. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
  • "The report which was presented at the end of December recommended reuse of the already modified internal space housing the library, and creation of additional usable space up to a total of approximately 1600 m² by lowering the floor to street level and modifying stairway areas without changing the external appearance of the building, which is characteristic of government buildings of the 1920s, particularly in its blocky ground floor." - this sentence is very large--

Kürbis () 11:57, 6 October 2012 (UTC)