Talk:Apollo Telescope Mount

A box aggressively attracts the marginally literate eye with apparent promises to contain a reductive summary of information; not all information can be so neatly contained. Like a bulleted list, or a time-line that substitutes for genuine history, it offers a competitive counter-article, stripped of nuance. As a substitute for accuracy and complexity, a box trumps all discourse.

— courtesy of User:Wetman

I call attention to MOS:INFOBOX and the essay WP:Disinfoboxes. Exactly which infobox should be used? And the article as it stands is so short, it would be a type 2 disinfobox. JustinTime55 (talk) 22:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Apollo Telescope Mount. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.nasm.si.edu/spacecraft/SS-ATM.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)