Talk:Arihant (Jainism)

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved per convincing counter-argument by Amakuru. No such user (talk) 14:08, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

• Arihant (Jainism) → Arihant
• Arihant → Arihant (disambiguation)

No other page has title "Arihant" -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 09:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Eventhorizon51 ^(talk) 14:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

• Support —Nimit (talk) 05:21, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose - the primary topic for Arihant is certainly not this. From common usage, and page views,[1] we see that either the Arihant-class submarine (37k views in a month), or the INS Arihant (25k views in a month) easily beat this page which has 6k views in a month. Retaining the Dab page seems to be best.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:46, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

  U might have confused "INS" Arihant for Arihant. Both the titles you mentioned are incomplete without prefix/suffix. They are Primary topic for Arihant submarine or INs Arihant not for the word "Arihant". -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

  Yes, but that's not how it works - a topic may be primary for a certain term even when the article isn't actually titled that way. This would be a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. My point is that when someone says "Arihant", unqualified, they're still more likely to be referring to the submarine than the Jainism. [2] refers to it simply as "Arihant".  — Amakuru (talk) 10:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.