Talk:Battle of the Notch

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Kumioko in topic GA Review
Good articleBattle of the Notch has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2010Good article nomineeListed
WikiProject iconKorea Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated working groups:
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Korean military history task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.
WikiProject iconUnited States Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCold War Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of the Notch/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

There is one disambioguous link for 24th Division. I ran the article through AWB and nothing significant came up there. I also checked the the external links and references and that comes out good. I checked the image and the only one on the article looks good although I would like to see one or two more if possible. The article is very well written and the grammer and prose are good. I am promoting it to GA. Good job on another one. --Kumioko (talk) 18:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reviewer: Kumioko (talk) 18:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)