Talk:Central European Free Trade Agreement

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Michaelscottuiuc in topic Relations w/ EU - Should we split two ideas?
WikiProject iconBosnia and Herzegovina Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconCentral European Free Trade Agreement is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconKosovo Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconCentral European Free Trade Agreement is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNorth Macedonia Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject North Macedonia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North Macedonia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMoldova Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMontenegro Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSerbia Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTrade Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.


Relations w/ EU - Should we split two ideas?

In the Relations with the European Union portion, the first sentence requires a citation. However, I think this sentence is really two distinct ideas which would require their own citations.The idea that former countries had already signed association agreements with the EU, could have a reference and stand on its own. I do have a citation for the second portion of the sentence that may be relevant. "CEFTA has served as a preparation for full EU membership" But this is technically an opinion, not fact. The citation I would use is that the CEFTA "is viewed as a preparatory instrument for the future European integration of states." Is this an acceptable edit? Michaelscottuiuc (talk) 22:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)