Talk:Conspiracy of the Pintos

If the Conspiracy of the Pintos occurred in 1787, it cannot have been "inspired by the French Revolution," which commenced two years later.

The name of this entry should be "Conspiracy of the Pintos", not "Conspiracy Of The Pintos". Please correct it.

This article seems biased. The author calls Tipu Sultan 'usurper' of Mysore. This is incorrect. Tipu Sultan inherited the Mysore throne from his father, Hyder Ali. Although there could arguably some truth in claiming Hyder Ali usurped the throne from Wodeyars (the earlier - and later - rulers of Mysore), his son simply inherited it. It appears the author is trying to portray Tipu Sultan as a small time chieftain. The truth is, Tipu Sultan ruled large swathes (perhaps tens of times as large as Goa!) of land.

Further, the article indicates that Tipu was aiming to convert christians (and incidentally hindus as well) to Islam. While I am no expert on Tipu and his religious tolerance or intolerance, I gather from existing evidence that this could not have been the case. Some of the circumstantial reasons for me to say so are:

1. The Mangalorean christian community thrives even today as does the hindu community
2. Tipu was one of the chief patrons of the famous Ranganath temple in Srirangapattana (or Serigapatam - anglicised) and many others. In fact, even today most of the guards in this temple are muslims.
3. In the city of Mysore itself there are many historical temples and churches that predate Tipu. While he could tolerate this religious diversity under his nose, why would Tipu want to islamise far away people?

Overall, the article needs to undergo a good un-biased edit.20:38, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Tipu was NOT a tolerant ruler. Please read the articles on the Seringapatam captivities:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captivity_of_Mangalorean_Catholics_at_Seringapatamhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captivity_of_Coorgis_at_Seringapatamhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captivity_of_Nairs_at_SeringapatamThese incidents prove the actions of the Pinto conspirators to be all the more reprehensible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.228.85.147 (talk) 20:38, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conspiracy of the Pintos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061214092018/http://www.goacom.com/culture/history/pinto.html to http://www.goacom.com/culture/history/pinto.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.goacom.com/the-pinto-rebellion

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)