Talk:Craig Steven Wright

    WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
    Taskforce icon
    This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
    WikiProject iconAustralia: Queensland Low‑importance
    WikiProject iconCraig Steven Wright is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
    LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
    Taskforce icon
    This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
    Note icon
    Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
    Note icon
    The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

    Contested deletion

    This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is still being worked on.

    "because it is still being worked on" - how apt :) Lovingboth (talk) 14:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

    23 October - Birthdate

    Craig, in this video seems to confirm his birthday is 23 October 1970 in this youtube video /0JvDauIX5lg?t=4393. Additionally on his form 1.977 filing he states his birthday is also 23 October 1970

    Can this please reflect additional sources from his business filings? this wiki only shows birth month and year, not the 23rd of October. 80.112.177.234 (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

    i can confirm this: proper timestamp is /watch?v=0JvDauIX5lg&t=4393s. [4393 seconds into the video] eyeCommented (talk) 14:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

    Question about Wikipedia neutrality

    This is just a question about how neutral the article and Wikipedia should be.


    "These claims are regarded as false by much of the media and the cryptocurrency community."


    Wouldn't the word "some" in the phrase "xxxx of the media" be better?


    It would also be better if it actually listed the groups involved like the backers such as Jack Dorsey, Block, Coinbase, etc. behind the crypto open patent alliance (COPA). https://www.opencrypto.org/


    Interestingly this crypto open patent alliance doesn't even have a Wikipedia page. But the open patent alliance not to be confused with COPA does have one.


    I think it would be better if Wikipedia didn't take sides and simply reported based on reliable sources which is always not easy 😁


    The court cases are online and are a wealth of information.


    I am willing to help if interested let me know


    @Ryozzo Ryozzo (talk) 22:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

    Not a doctor

    The article claims that he has a phd. Reliable sources show that his “phd” is a lie. Here is such source. 4.30.80.228 (talk) 03:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

    The PhD the article refers to was granted in 2017, the article you link is dated 2015. I'm absolutely not disputing the fact he lied about having a PhD before then of course. The wikipedia article cites this FWIW. Uelx (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
    yeah, the PhD is real - it's on the CSU site - David Gerard (talk) 19:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

    "Faketoshi" listed at Redirects for discussion

    The redirect Faketoshi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Faketoshi until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)