Talk:Criticism of Greenpeace

Greenpeace accepts bitcoin donations and at least unofficially uses bitcoin. This support for bitcoin is surprising since it consumes roughly 24TWh annually, comparable to a small country. Using traditional banking would be thousands of times more environment friendly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:20C0:5570:210D:47FB:B904:6866 (talk) 01:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Criticism of Greenpeace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.environment.gov.au/settlements/chemicals/international/pubs/seminar-1.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070318195919/http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/greenpeace-response to http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/greenpeace-response
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110820150558/http://scienceblogs.com/sciencepunk/2011/07/in_the_early_hours_of.php to http://scienceblogs.com/sciencepunk/2011/07/in_the_early_hours_of.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Criticism of Greenpeace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070816203438/http://www.greenpeace.org/international/press/releases/the-stockholm-convention-s-ent to http://www.greenpeace.org/international/press/releases/the-stockholm-convention-s-ent

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Greenpeace falsely claimed that nuclear fusion is unsafe and produces waste like nuclear fission.^[1] However, nuclear fusion does not produce nuclear waste nor is there a meltdown risk because the conditions required to sustain nuclear fusion mean that if there is a containment breach, the fusion reaction would simply halt.^[2][3]

This is incorrect as nuclear fusion does produce nuclear waste as you need to have nuclear material to produce the reaction, which does produce nuclear waste as not all the material will be used and needs to be constantly refilled. The Sun does not produce nuclear waste but that is whole different matter.

https://thebulletin.org/2017/04/fusion-reactors-not-what-theyre-cracked-up-to-be/