Talk:Defining equation (physical chemistry)

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Maschen in topic Merge
WikiProject iconChemistry Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMeasurement (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.

chemical spillage

The physical chem section in the defining equation (physics) article and some thermodynamics formulae bloated that article, it makes sense spill this overflow into a new article containing all chemical definitions. All other chemical definitions will be added soon... Maschen (talk) 18:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

List?

This article is almost a list. Is it worth formally reclassifying it as such? Brammers (talk/c) 17:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

It clearly is a list, not just change the settings? Maschen (talk) 12:54, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Move thermodynamics content back to defining equation (physics)

I propose this move since these definitions are from statistical thermodynamics - not just chemistry, both fields make use of them but we can say this in the articles and cross-link between them. Just becuase one definition is called "chemical potential", doesn't imply it has to be in this article... This article should concentrate (excuse pun) on the intrinsic chemical definitions such as the reaction kinetics, energetics, atomic quantification, electronegativity etc. as already inlcuded. I'll move the content now. F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 06:41, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Merge

See here, thanks, Maschen (talk) 12:54, 11 September 2012 (UTC)