Talk:Durvasa

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Hinduism: Krishnaism Mid‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as Mid-importance).

The name

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Durvasa or Durvasas? in the original Sanskrit.

Imc 22:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

About Siva purana

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the section 'Meeting with Ambarisha', there are two versions of the story given. One is according to Bhagavata purana, and the other is according to Siva purana. However for siva purana version, sources are not cited. Who ever has made this change, please respond by providing citations. Otherwise this can be removed.--రవిచంద్ర (talk) 11:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Lead section line

I think that "In Hindu Puranas, Durvasa (Sanskrit: दुर्वासा) also known as Durvasas (Sanskrit: दुर्वासस्), was an ancient Rishi and the son of Anasuya and Atri" should be changed to "In Hindu mythology, Durvasa (Sanskrit: दुर्वासा) also known as Durvasas (Sanskrit: दुर्वासस्), was an legendary Rishi and the son of Anasuya and Atri". The reason being that Durvasa does not only appear in the Puranas, in fact, the majority of content in this article is from the Mahabharata and Ramayana. In addition, he should be described as legendary, rather than ancient, given the fact he is not an actual historical figure. These sources state how scholars have rejected the Puranas, Mahabharata, and Ramayana as historical documents, and that how only those Puranic characters who appear in the Vedas can be considered as historical figures. If we put ancient, then it is assuming that Durvasa was a real person, when he was not. Whereas someone like the sage Atri is an actual historical figure, and is described on his page as a "Vedic sage", which is appropriate.^[1]^[2]

[1]

[2]