Talk:Eight-Nation Alliance

Military history: Asian / British / Chinese / European / French / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	British military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

Someone reverted my change

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion

I changed "US annexation of the Philippines" to "US colonization of the Philippines" and someone reverted it. They say it's my point of view or idk. Well annexation is a point of view aswell, and Philippines were a US colony and treated as a colony, it had even a colonial status.

== Undid vandalism that was done by a Chinese Communist Party member == (or silenced people from telling their own story; it depends on how you see it)

It should be fixed now — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.50.184 (talk) 22:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

That is bullshit. It is sad that Wikipeida is also a propaganda machinery for American imperialism. Brain washing of the worst type is brain washing that you don't know you are being brain washed. That robs you your freedom of thought. You can include in that all material produce in the US and its cronies - art, science, news and entertainment.

I miss communism where I used to have freedom of thought, if not freedom of speech. I live in the west now and am struggling everyday to keep my freedom of thought and losing that battle by the day. 199.185.120.103 (talk) 09:57, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

ikr Thehistorianisaac (talk) 03:57, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the backup CWH :) 122.57.55.211 (talk) 05:59, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Second, then First

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is there a strong reason for the peculiar order? 99.228.43.228 (talk) 20:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Declaration of war

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The lead para of the article currently states: "Neither the Chinese nor the quasi-concerted foreign allies issued a formal declaration of war."

But then this article also exists Imperial decree of declaration of war against foreign powers which states: "The declaration of war was one of the direct causes of the Boxer Rebellion and the Eight-Nation Alliance's formation, which then led to Boxer Protocol."

So which is it? Was there not a declaration of war by the Qing here. Gotitbro (talk) 08:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, weird. Unless this is some case of people from their specific time not seeing actions from any earlier period as "official" according to some weird criterion, the Qing definitely officially declared war. Remsense诉 08:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Add topic