Talk:Glenora Distillers

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Canada: Nova Scotia Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.

Rating

Latest comment: 11 years ago6 comments6 people in discussion

There is a clear consensus to merge Glen Breton Rare to Glenora Distillers. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{WrestleMania XXVIII} _{The Undertaker 20–0} 07:44, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rated as low since it only a small, relatively unknown distillery. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 17:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

I am proposing that Glen Breton Rare be merged into Glenora Distillers as there seems to be little difference in the content. Tchaliburton (talk) 01:07, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

I agree that there is a lot in common and so merge is a valid option. BUT - the Glen Breton Rare page does contain significant information that relates to International Trademark law and disputes that needs to be preserved. It also contains a rather important phrase to Whisky fans, aficionados and connoisseurs concerning "Glen Breton Ice" - "Glenora Distillery introduced the world's first ever single malt aged in Ice Wine barrels". That is not clear in the Glenora Distillers entry. When it comes to whisky the taste is derived from three things - the water - the grain used - the barrel it's aged in. The barrels are very important and the distinction is Noteworthy and important to the overall subject of Whisky. As Whisky production uses recycled barrels, what has been in them before does have a significant impact on the flavour and nature of the Whisky. That is not made clear on other Wikipages dealing with the subject of Whisky. Now where can I get me hands on some Glen Breton Ice to see how it tastes? Media-Hound 'D 3rd P^) (talk) 18:20, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Merge -- Glen Breton Rare by itself does not make a substantial article. With some proper merging, the two should be reconsiled quite nicely. C_(u)w_(t)C_(c) 04:31, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Merge - Without the naming dispute and the taste description (does that belong in the article at all?) there is no article left about the brand. Night of the Big Wind _talk 07:55, 22 May 2012 (UTC)<humour on>But I might change my mind when the distiller sends me a dozen of bottles.<humour off>

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic