Talk:Hindu rate of growth

"This meaning of the term, popularised by Robert McNamara"

Is there published evidence of this claim? I am interested in where the writer of this article found this information. - TB

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hindu rate of growth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071230190927/http://www.indianexpress.com/story/254969.html to http://www.indianexpress.com/story/254969.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Any discussion of the term "Hindu rate of growth" is incomplete without noting that the government of India was in no way connected to Hindu thought or practice during the time in question. Jawaharlal Nehru, who single-handedly set the socialist and non-aligned policies of India, was anything but a Hindu in outlook. Moreover, it is extremely disturbing that a term that denounces and ridicules a billion Hindus should continue to exist. No one talks of a socialist or Communist or Jewish rate of growth. Only Hindus are defamed in this manner. Sooku (talk) 04:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

"The usage of the term has been criticized by modern economists due to fact that cause of low growth was failed socialist model and economic mismanagement "

This line has been cited from an article that starts with "This is a short, hurried and somewhat angry post." The article sounds very biased to me, going to the length of saying how Hinduism is anti-socialist. Maybe cite a better citation. and also name the economists like Sanjeev Sabhlok mentioned in the said line (...been criticized by modern economists...).

This article was published on the Times of India (which is reputable enough albeit this particular article has the "DISCLAIMER: Views expressed above are the author's own." disclaimer at the bottom)

This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.

The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)