Talk:Jonathan Ames

Comics: Creators / United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brother of Mark Ames?

No, he is not.

Removed website

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed a link to the author's website, because it automatically redirected to an Amazon search. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GreetingsThree (talk • contribs) 04:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Jonathan Ames is bisexual

Latest comment: 8 months ago6 comments2 people in discussion

This needs to be mentioned in the article. He wrote newspaper articles and biographical writing about how he is bisexual. 100.34.234.175 (talk) 10:28, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

According to WP:NPOV policy, All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. And according to the biographies of living persons policy,

any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.

So reliable sources are needed to support this content; we cannot add original research to the article. Beccaynr (talk) 16:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

huh? It has nothing to do with neutrality. Did you ever even read any of his books, his memoir, or watch the short highly sexual documentary about him where Jonathan Ames himself writes and says how he is bisexual? 100.34.234.175 (talk) 19:22, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

MOS:BLPLEAD/MOS:CONTEXTBIO also applies, e.g. "sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless relevant to the subject's notability." Without any cited sources establishing this, attempts to add this to the first sentence of this article appear to be necessary to delete per WP:BLPREMOVE. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 19:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

huh? What do you mean cited sources? Ames himself wrote about his own bisexuality in his own memoirs. It is not disputiable and a memoir written by Jon Ames himself is a source. This is not debatable, and if he were gay or homosexual, or heterosexual you probably wouldn't care if it were added to the article. 100.34.234.175 (talk) 00:28, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

IP, this information is not cited to reliable sources in the article, nor is this information established by reliable sources as relevant to his notability. Therefore, it is not suitable for inclusion, especially in the lead of the article. I have linked to relevant policies and guidance in this discussion for your review; you can also ask questions at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 01:13, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Add topic